2002
DOI: 10.1127/lr/13/2002/225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality in rivers: a scientific basis for Polish standard method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of biological methods applied in the monitoring of rivers in European countries reveals that indices of macroinvertebrate communities are one of the most widely used tools in the biological assessment of rivers. The studies which enable biotic index definition deal mostly with the macrozoobenthic community structure over a long time period to determine the dynamics of physicochemical parameters and their influence on freshwater biota (Fleituch et al, 2002;Fleituch, 2003;Buffagni et al, 2004;Munné & Prat, 2004;Artemiadou & Lazaridou, 2005;Gabriels et al, 2005). In Belgium there is the Belgian Biotic Index (De Pauw & Vanhooren, 1983), in Denmark the Saprobity Index (Pantle & Buck, 1955), in France the Global Biotic Index or IBGN (AFNOR, 1992); in Germany the Saprobity Index (Knöpp, 1954;Pantle & Buck, 1955); in Ireland the Quality Rating System (Flanagan & Toner, 1972); in Italy the Extended Biotic Index (IBE) (Ghetti, 2001); in Luxembourg the Biotic Index (Verneaux & Tuffery, 1968); in the Netherland the Quality Index (K135) (Tolkamp & Gardeniers, 1988); in Spain the modified Biological Monitoring Working Party (B.M.W.P.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of biological methods applied in the monitoring of rivers in European countries reveals that indices of macroinvertebrate communities are one of the most widely used tools in the biological assessment of rivers. The studies which enable biotic index definition deal mostly with the macrozoobenthic community structure over a long time period to determine the dynamics of physicochemical parameters and their influence on freshwater biota (Fleituch et al, 2002;Fleituch, 2003;Buffagni et al, 2004;Munné & Prat, 2004;Artemiadou & Lazaridou, 2005;Gabriels et al, 2005). In Belgium there is the Belgian Biotic Index (De Pauw & Vanhooren, 1983), in Denmark the Saprobity Index (Pantle & Buck, 1955), in France the Global Biotic Index or IBGN (AFNOR, 1992); in Germany the Saprobity Index (Knöpp, 1954;Pantle & Buck, 1955); in Ireland the Quality Rating System (Flanagan & Toner, 1972); in Italy the Extended Biotic Index (IBE) (Ghetti, 2001); in Luxembourg the Biotic Index (Verneaux & Tuffery, 1968); in the Netherland the Quality Index (K135) (Tolkamp & Gardeniers, 1988); in Spain the modified Biological Monitoring Working Party (B.M.W.P.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH of the water pH in Lakes influenced by physico-chemical and biotic interactions of environmental factors [1,4,21,26,28,32]. The degree of acidity affects directly the life processes occurring in ecosystems, among others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High alkalinity beneficial for assimilation, and the same use, located in water, nitrogen and phosphorus compounds are much more accessible than in an acid medium. Like high acidity, also clearly detrimental impact on organisms has excessive alkalinity of natural waters -pH above 9.0 [2,[25][26][27][28]37]. Have studied lake close to neutral pH -7.70 to 7.74.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High alkalinity beneficial for assimilation, and the same use, located in water, nitrogen and phosphorus compounds are much more accessible than in an acid medium. Like high acidity, also clearly detrimental impact on organisms has excessive alkalinity of natural waters -pH above 9.0 [2,[25][26][27][28]37]. Have studied lake close to neutral pH -7.67 to 7.73.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%