2006
DOI: 10.1128/aac.50.5.1896-1899.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrolide-Resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Norway: Population Structure and Resistance Determinants

Abstract: A 2.7% prevalence of macrolide resistance in 1,657 Norwegian clinical Streptococcus pyogenes isolates was primarily due to erm(TR) (59%) and mef(A) (20%). Four clonal complexes comprised 75% of the strains. Macrolide resistance in S. pyogenes in Norway is imported as resistant strains or locally selected in internationally disseminated susceptible clones.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
18
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While macrolide resistance rates of over 20% were reported from Italy (6) and both macrolide and tetracycline resistance rates of over 90% have been found in China (10), antibiotic resistance in GAS is still rare in Norway. This finding is consistent with previous reports from both Norway and Denmark (13,14). Only one ofloxacin-resistant emm-6 isolate has been reported previously (15); however, the major part of fluoroquinolone nonsusceptibility is found in emm-6 strains (1, 15).…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…While macrolide resistance rates of over 20% were reported from Italy (6) and both macrolide and tetracycline resistance rates of over 90% have been found in China (10), antibiotic resistance in GAS is still rare in Norway. This finding is consistent with previous reports from both Norway and Denmark (13,14). Only one ofloxacin-resistant emm-6 isolate has been reported previously (15); however, the major part of fluoroquinolone nonsusceptibility is found in emm-6 strains (1, 15).…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Among them are emm-4 strains persistent in Finland, Sweden, and other European countries since the 1990s. Macrolide-resistant emm-4, emm-75, and emm-94 strains were also identified in a study of macrolide resistance in Norway between 1993 and 2002 by Littauer et al (28). However, our emm-75 strains were resistant or of intermediate susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, which may be explained by the loss of macrolide resistance and acquisition of fluoroquinolone resistance, as described by Billal et al (5,6), suggesting that emm-75 strains presently circulating in Norway have changed genetically since 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of resistance is clearly related to local prescribing habits; nevertheless, resistant strains of S. aureus and S. pyogenes are emerging worldwide, leading to concerns about the potential for reduced clinical efficacy of commonly used treatments [22,28,29,30,31,32], particularly in countries where antibiotics can be purchased without prescription [33]. For example, two studies of isolates from a range of primary and secondary skin infections in European subjects revealed sodium fusidate resistance rates of 50 and 32.5% [22, 34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%