2017
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophage Polarization Modulates FcγR- and CD13-Mediated Phagocytosis and Reactive Oxygen Species Production, Independently of Receptor Membrane Expression

Abstract: In response to microenvironmental cues, macrophages undergo a profound phenotypic transformation acquiring distinct activation phenotypes ranging from pro-inflammatory (M1) to anti-inflammatory (M2). To study how activation phenotype influences phagocytosis and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) mediated by receptors for IgG antibodies (Fcγ receptors) and by CD13, human monocyte-derived macrophages were polarized to distinct phenotypes using IFN-γ (Mϕ-IFN-γ), IL-4 (Mϕ-IL-4), or IL-10 (Mϕ-IL-10). Pheno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
8
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the M1/M2 differentiation of the human primary monocytes was also analyzed and it was found that, for the specific donor shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information, in either absence or presence of Ti microbeads in the bottom tissue chamber of the bioreactor, the primary monocytes expressed both M1‐ and M2‐associated surface markers approximately in equal ratio, with most cells exhibiting double stains. The differences of M1/M2 differentiation in response to the Ti microbeads between the human primary monocytes and the THP‐1 monocytes could possibly be explained by the fact that, in the cell line, the expression of each marker is induced in response to different environmental stimuli, while in the primary cells, these markers are constitutively expressed and the intensities of expressions change when responding to different stimuli . Indeed, when we examined the FBR of monocytes derived from three different donors, it was found that, interestingly, different individuals exhibited varying degrees of immune responses to the same Ti microbeads (Figure d).…”
Section: Parameters and Constants Used For Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the M1/M2 differentiation of the human primary monocytes was also analyzed and it was found that, for the specific donor shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information, in either absence or presence of Ti microbeads in the bottom tissue chamber of the bioreactor, the primary monocytes expressed both M1‐ and M2‐associated surface markers approximately in equal ratio, with most cells exhibiting double stains. The differences of M1/M2 differentiation in response to the Ti microbeads between the human primary monocytes and the THP‐1 monocytes could possibly be explained by the fact that, in the cell line, the expression of each marker is induced in response to different environmental stimuli, while in the primary cells, these markers are constitutively expressed and the intensities of expressions change when responding to different stimuli . Indeed, when we examined the FBR of monocytes derived from three different donors, it was found that, interestingly, different individuals exhibited varying degrees of immune responses to the same Ti microbeads (Figure d).…”
Section: Parameters and Constants Used For Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, it was presumed that changes in expression levels of these receptors determines the extent of phagocytosis. However, it has now been confirmed that macrophage polarization state determines the extent of phagocytosis and ROS production rather than the changes in receptor expression (Mendoza-Coronel and Ortega, 2017). Further, pattern recognition leads to release of cytokines involved in initial response.…”
Section: Macrophages In Acute Lung Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M1(IFNγ) monocytes have an increased surface expression of CD40 and CD80, and produce pro-in ammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNF (7,9). These cells have also been shown to have decreased Fc-mediated phagocytosis (10). In contrast, M2(IL-4) monocytes express high levels of CD206, TGM2 and PPARγ (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%