2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrophage PPARγ, a Lipid Activated Transcription Factor Controls the Growth Factor GDF3 and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration

Abstract: SUMMARY Tissue regeneration requires inflammatory and reparatory activity of macrophages. Macrophages detect and eliminate the damaged tissue and subsequently promote regeneration. This dichotomy requires the switch of effector functions of macrophages coordinated with other cell types inside the injured tissue. The gene regulatory events supporting the sensory and effector functions of macrophages involved in tissue repair are not well understood. Here we show that the lipid activated transcription factor, PP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
168
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(37 reference statements)
8
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected GDF3 for a proof‐of‐concept experiment to evaluate whether the observed impaired phenotypic transition in macrophage phenotype from inflammatory to repair type (Patsalos et al, 2017) can contribute to age‐related delay in muscle regeneration. In line with previous findings (Varga et al, 2016), GDF3 protein expression in whole‐muscle lysates of CTX‐injured young mice showed a pronounced induction, which peaked at Day 4 (Figure 2a), at the time when inflammation subsides, and regenerative processes start to dominate within the injured muscle. In controlled in vitro conditions, addition of recombinant GDF3 (using either an in‐house recombinant protein or a commercially available one) in primary myoblasts induced a robust effect in myotube formation (Figure 2b upper panel) and a pronounced increase in their fusion index (Figure 2b lower panel).…”
Section: Introduction Results Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We selected GDF3 for a proof‐of‐concept experiment to evaluate whether the observed impaired phenotypic transition in macrophage phenotype from inflammatory to repair type (Patsalos et al, 2017) can contribute to age‐related delay in muscle regeneration. In line with previous findings (Varga et al, 2016), GDF3 protein expression in whole‐muscle lysates of CTX‐injured young mice showed a pronounced induction, which peaked at Day 4 (Figure 2a), at the time when inflammation subsides, and regenerative processes start to dominate within the injured muscle. In controlled in vitro conditions, addition of recombinant GDF3 (using either an in‐house recombinant protein or a commercially available one) in primary myoblasts induced a robust effect in myotube formation (Figure 2b upper panel) and a pronounced increase in their fusion index (Figure 2b lower panel).…”
Section: Introduction Results Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several members of the TGFβ family (Egerman et al, 2015) are known regulators of muscle regeneration, whose members are secreted by repair macrophages acting in a paracrine manner (Massague, Cheifetz, Endo, & Nadal‐Ginard, 1986; McPherron, Lawler, & Lee, 1997), including GDF3 (Varga et al, 2016). We selected GDF3 for a proof‐of‐concept experiment to evaluate whether the observed impaired phenotypic transition in macrophage phenotype from inflammatory to repair type (Patsalos et al, 2017) can contribute to age‐related delay in muscle regeneration.…”
Section: Introduction Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for AMPK, we used LysM‐Cre;PPARγ fl/fl mice to address the role of macrophagic PPARγ during muscle regeneration in collaboration with L. Nagy's laboratory (Debrecen University, Hungary and Sanford Burnham Prebys Discovery, Orlando, FL, USA). Mice deficient for PPARγ in macrophages, as well as wild‐type mice transplanted with PPARγ‐KO bone marrow, show impaired muscle regeneration with lasting inflammation and strongly reduced size of the new myofibers, even several weeks after injury . However, on the contrary to what is observed for macrophages deficient for AMPK, there is no alteration of the kinetics of macrophage phenotype during muscle regeneration in vivo in LysM‐Cre;PPARγ fl/fl mice.…”
Section: Metabolic Regulation Of Macrophage Inflammatory Status Durinmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, Ly6C neg macrophages do not express canonical M2 (IL-4) markers and their expression profile does not match with any of the in vitro 28 activation status tested so far [51]. Moreover, muscle regeneration is not altered in animals deficient for STAT6, the master regulator of IL-4 signaling [62]. In conclusion, kinetic analysis reveals a highly dynamic nature of gene expression of macrophages, identifying important metabolism changes associated with the key steps during muscle regeneration (Fig.…”
Section: Metabolic Profiling Of Macrophage Subsets During Skeletal Mumentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, LysM‐cre/Pparg lox/lox mice lacking PPAR‐γ specifically in myeloid cells develop insulin resistance . M2 macrophages are also involved in tissue repair and PPAR‐γ in skin macrophages was found to regulate wound healing by mediating phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and repair of skeletal muscle following injury . Data suggesting an important role of M2 macrophages in browning of white adipose tissue and thermogenesis are controversial .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%