2016
DOI: 10.5089/9781498342872.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroprudential Policies in Southeastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other countries in the region adopted similarly proactive macroprudential policymaking during this period, see, e.g.,Dimova et al (2016) andVandenbussche (2012).17 Prior to 2004 there were two changes in reserve requirement ratios, namely a reduction in reserve requirements in domestic currency in 2002Q4 and an increase in reserve requirements in foreign currency in 2002Q4. There were no macroprudential measures in 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other countries in the region adopted similarly proactive macroprudential policymaking during this period, see, e.g.,Dimova et al (2016) andVandenbussche (2012).17 Prior to 2004 there were two changes in reserve requirement ratios, namely a reduction in reserve requirements in domestic currency in 2002Q4 and an increase in reserve requirements in foreign currency in 2002Q4. There were no macroprudential measures in 2003.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microprudential regulation has also proved insufficient to prevent the buildup of systemic risks leading up to the GFC. Budnik and Kleibl (2018); Vandenbussche Vogel, and Detragiache (2012); and Dimova, Kongsamut, and Vandenbussche (2016) provide detailed databases of major prudential measures adopted since the 1990s in the EU 1 and Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European (CESEE) countries. 2 They show that an increased number of European countries developed or strengthened their macroprudential toolkits since the GFC.…”
Section: Glossarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now turn to the assessment of the measures' effectiveness by analyzing the evolution of two of the specific target variables these measures were meant to affect, namely credit growth and household credit growth. As mentioned in the introduction, an assessment of effectiveness with respect to two other target variables (foreign currency lending, and banks' foreign borrowing) can be found in Dimova, Kongsamut, and Vandenbussche (2016). As noted above, all four countries had concerns about excessive domestic credit growth, and the full range of instruments was deployed.…”
Section: Were Credit Growth Measures Effective?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A companion working paper Dimova, Kongsamut, and Vandenbussche (2016) provides a more extensive discussion of the macroeconomic background of the four countries and assesses the effectiveness of macroprudential measures across two additional objectives (managing the share of foreign currency lending and managing banks' foreign borrowing) as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%