2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009wr008839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroscale hydrologic modeling of ecologically relevant flow metrics

Abstract: [1] Stream hydrology strongly affects the structure of aquatic communities. Changes to air temperature and precipitation driven by increased greenhouse gas concentrations are shifting timing and volume of streamflows potentially affecting these communities. The variable infiltration capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrologic model has been employed at regional scales to describe and forecast hydrologic changes but has been calibrated and applied mainly to large rivers. An important question is how well VIC runoff si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
187
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, as precipitation patterns and snow accumulation in mountain environments change, so will the magnitude and timing of stream runoff (12,31). The stream temperature scenario used here was founded on empirical support at more than 16,000 sites, but flow scenarios from hydrologic models are based on sparse monitoring networks of 10s to 100s of sites and predictions require extensive spatial extrapolations that may result in imprecise estimates of network extent and flow dynamics (41). The problem is most acute in headwater streams that are rarely instrumented and have small flow volumes, thereby translating to large relative prediction errors (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as precipitation patterns and snow accumulation in mountain environments change, so will the magnitude and timing of stream runoff (12,31). The stream temperature scenario used here was founded on empirical support at more than 16,000 sites, but flow scenarios from hydrologic models are based on sparse monitoring networks of 10s to 100s of sites and predictions require extensive spatial extrapolations that may result in imprecise estimates of network extent and flow dynamics (41). The problem is most acute in headwater streams that are rarely instrumented and have small flow volumes, thereby translating to large relative prediction errors (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winter was defined as December 1st through February 28th. Two candidate mean flow metrics were mean annual flow (mflow) and mean summer flow (sflow), with summer defined as the period between the decline of the spring flood and September 30th (38). All flow metrics were derived from the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model (39) coupled with simple routing (38) to produce daily hydrographs for stream segments in the 1:100 K National Hydrography Database (NHD) Plus dataset (http://www.horizon-systems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one 328 monitoring goal is to develop accurate prediction maps showing spatial variation in one or more 329 thermal metrics (e.g., Isaak et al, 2017b), sites may also need to be more densely sampled than the 330 above considerations otherwise suggest. Spatial autocorrelation in temperature metric values is 331 minimal beyond network distances of 10-100 km (Isaak et al, 2010), so similar sensor spacing is 332 required to generate the most accurate maps. Given the extent of most river networks, that would 333 often translate to a large number of sites but most of these could be monitored for short periods 334 while temporal dynamics were represented by a subset of long-term sites since temporal covariance 335 among sites would be strong.…”
Section: Implications For Monitoring and Bioassessments 314mentioning
confidence: 99%