2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4822121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroscopic acoustoelectric charge transport in graphene

Abstract: We demonstrate macroscopic acoustoelectric transport in graphene, transferred onto piezoelectric lithium niobate substrates, between electrodes up to 500 μm apart. Using double finger interdigital transducers we have characterised the acoustoelectric current as a function of both surface acoustic wave intensity and frequency. The results are consistent with a relatively simple classical relaxation model, in which the acoustoelectric current is proportional to both the surface acoustic wave intensity and the at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
79
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
79
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of gate capacitance, ≈ 1 μF/cm 2 , was taken from that calculated by Chakraborty et al [31] for a similar configuration. The values of electron and hole mobility obtained, approximately 5 cm 2 /(V·s), are much smaller than those typical for CVD graphene on Si/SiO 2 , but are consistent with the values of mobility we have previously extracted from SAW measurements [26,27] on similar graphene/lithium niobate hybrids. The measured SAW amplitude and phase at 11 MHz from the same device are plotted as a function of applied gate bias in Figs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of gate capacitance, ≈ 1 μF/cm 2 , was taken from that calculated by Chakraborty et al [31] for a similar configuration. The values of electron and hole mobility obtained, approximately 5 cm 2 /(V·s), are much smaller than those typical for CVD graphene on Si/SiO 2 , but are consistent with the values of mobility we have previously extracted from SAW measurements [26,27] on similar graphene/lithium niobate hybrids. The measured SAW amplitude and phase at 11 MHz from the same device are plotted as a function of applied gate bias in Figs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For example, SAW devices that are responsive to hydrogen and carbon monoxide [19], and moisture [20][21][22][23] have been reported. Acoustic charge transport has also very recently been reported in graphene [24,25], and we have investigated it in monolayer graphene, produced by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and transferred onto lithium niobate SAW devices, both at room temperature [26], at low temperature [27], and under illumination [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At both SAW frequencies, negative I ae was observed, corresponding to the net transport of electrons by the SAW, suggesting that the sample was ndoped. This is in contrast to previous measurements 21 where the acoustoelectric current corresponded to the net transport of holes. In the current case, the vacuum chamber, with the sample mounted inside, was pumped continuously for a number of weeks before measurements began.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…[14][15][16][17][18] Acoustic charge transport has very recently been reported in graphene, 19,20 and we have investigated it in monolayer graphene, produced by chemical vapour deposition (CVD), transferred onto lithium niobate SAW devices, both at room temperature 21 and low temperature. 22 In this paper, we show that illumination of the same devices, using blue (450 nm) and red (735 nm) light-emitting diodes (LEDs), causes an increase in the acoustoelectric current which is much larger than the associated change in the conductivity of the graphene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the form of the spectrum, there are many features defining the charge transport, 7,8 in particular, the high-current transport. [9][10][11] A series of related studies was performed recently to understand (i) the conductivity of graphene and its carrier dynamics, [12][13][14][15][16][17] (ii) plasmonic effects, [18][19][20][21] (iii) the own phonon generation by the carrier current, [22][23][24][25] (iv) the interaction between graphene electrons and SAWs, [26][27][28][29] and (v) sandwich-like "graphene-piezoelectric" structures, which allow one to create a new class of opto-acousto-electronic devices. [30][31][32][33][34] Nevertheless, the problem of modeling SAW amplification in graphene-based SAW amplifiers has not been studied systematically to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%