2010
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/08-0113)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macrostructure in the Narratives of Estonian Children With Typical Development and Language Impairment

Abstract: The contrasts between stories of TD children and between TD and LI children are discussed. The findings support the suitability of the SG model in terms of quantity of story information units for language assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, narrative analysis at the story-level that relates to the narrative structure and inclusion of specific narrative elements can be regarded as a more culture-related dimension of narrative production, considering its sensitivity to the sociocultural values of the target language community, while that at the language-level could be regarded as more of a linguistic dimension. Accordingly, Soodla and Kikas (2010) suggest that "while aspects of culture play a large role in stories' macrostructural features, linguistic factors have greater influence on the microstructure of produced narratives" (p. 1324).…”
Section: Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overall, narrative analysis at the story-level that relates to the narrative structure and inclusion of specific narrative elements can be regarded as a more culture-related dimension of narrative production, considering its sensitivity to the sociocultural values of the target language community, while that at the language-level could be regarded as more of a linguistic dimension. Accordingly, Soodla and Kikas (2010) suggest that "while aspects of culture play a large role in stories' macrostructural features, linguistic factors have greater influence on the microstructure of produced narratives" (p. 1324).…”
Section: Backgroundsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Liles et al, 1995;McCabe & Peterson, 1984;McCabe & Rollins, 1994). The majority of macrostructural measures of children's narratives share the same underlying principles of the story grammar/episodic structure description model (Fiestas & Peña, 2004;Schneider et al, 2006;Price et al, 2006;Soodla & Kikas, 2010). The story grammar model proposes that all stories have a setting and episode system; the setting provides background information and introductory statements about the characters and the providing context, while the episode system includes three main components that occur in all stories: (a) an initiating event (i.e.…”
Section: Narrative Development In Typically Developing Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global aspects of story-telling, including quantity and quality of goal-directed events, internal state expressions and inferencing strategies have also been found to be fragile in children with SLI (Soodla & Kikas, 2010;Bishop & Donlan, 2005;Reilly et al, 2004;Manhardt & Rescorla, 2002). Other studies of narratives of children with SLI have provided conflicting evidence regarding their planning and discourse organization skills.…”
Section: Narratives In Children With Slimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandler and Johnson 1977, Rumelhart 1975, Stein and Glenn 1978, Thorndyke 1977. This kind of research involved the investigation of narrative skills in adults and children specifically, and has posited two classes of theoretical structures known as "story grammars" and the closely related "story schemas" (Mandler 1983, Shapiro and Hudson 1991, Soodla and Kikas 2010. These hypothetical mental representations 2 have been assumed to provide a theoretical account of the structural organisation that causes one instance of discourse to be perceived by an addressee as a coherent narrative, while an alternative arrangement of the same set of utterances or sentences may be judged to be utterly incoherent by the same addressee.…”
Section: Previous Research On Narrative Text Structure: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%