Abstract:The best mean postoperative vision (LogMAR 0.35) was seen in patients with detachment of <1 week duration. Patients <60 years are more likely to achieve visual improvement despite the duration of the detachment. Macula off detachments of >6 weeks duration have a significantly poor postoperative visual prognosis. Awareness of this visual prognosis can assist in planning the timing of surgery to ensure an acceptable result.
“…Although other factors were discussed in previous studies, we could not confirm the relevance of duration of macular detachment (as it was not recorded in the SPR Study) [6,23,25,26] and patient age [6,23,25,29] to final visual results.…”
Final BCVA is the most important outcome for patients undergoing RRD surgery. Our results demonstrate that the final BCVA is related to a higher preoperative number of breaks in both subtrials. Additional risk factors varied between phakic and pseudophakic subgroups.
“…Although other factors were discussed in previous studies, we could not confirm the relevance of duration of macular detachment (as it was not recorded in the SPR Study) [6,23,25,26] and patient age [6,23,25,29] to final visual results.…”
Final BCVA is the most important outcome for patients undergoing RRD surgery. Our results demonstrate that the final BCVA is related to a higher preoperative number of breaks in both subtrials. Additional risk factors varied between phakic and pseudophakic subgroups.
“…These include the age of patients,12 21 22 preoperative PVR,8 18 20 extension of RD,8 11 previous RD or other ocular surgery,18 and the status of the macula 12 20 22. In our series, only 35% of the RDs had macula-on at the time of surgery.…”
No differences in anatomical success between phakic and pseudophakic eyes were found in this series. Pars plana vitrectomy was most often performed in pseudophakic eyes and had a greater probability of a worse final visual acuity than scleral buckling.
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16]21 In addition, two reviews were found. The 14 studies found consisted of 7 prospective observational 9,10,16,18-20,22 and 7 retrospective observational studies.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.