2019
DOI: 10.21105/joss.01757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAESTROeX: A Massively Parallel Low Mach Number Astrophysical Solver

Abstract: We present MAESTROeX, a massively parallel solver for low Mach number astrophysical flows. The underlying low Mach number equation set allows for efficient, long-time integration for highly subsonic flows compared to compressible approaches. MAESTROeX is suitable for modeling full spherical stars as well as well as planar simulations of dynamics within localized regions of a star, and can robustly handle several orders of magnitude of density and pressure stratification. Previously, we have described the devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We emphasise that in order to obtain this result, we needed to use the momentum equation (2.21), which includes an additional force not present in previous pseudo-incompressible models (e.g. Durran 1989; Almgren et al 2008; Klein & Pauluis 2012; Vasil et al 2013; O'Neill & Klein 2014; Fan et al 2019 a ). The presence of this force follows directly from Hamilton's principle.…”
Section: The Constrained Fluid Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We emphasise that in order to obtain this result, we needed to use the momentum equation (2.21), which includes an additional force not present in previous pseudo-incompressible models (e.g. Durran 1989; Almgren et al 2008; Klein & Pauluis 2012; Vasil et al 2013; O'Neill & Klein 2014; Fan et al 2019 a ). The presence of this force follows directly from Hamilton's principle.…”
Section: The Constrained Fluid Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This function will depend on the choice of boundary condition at the upper boundary. For example, in the case where the upper boundary is impenetrable it is convenient to eliminate between (2.36) and (2.37), leading to a constraint equation for the velocity field: where we have defined to match the notation used in the low-Mach-number literature (Fan et al 2019 a ). If we neglect the term here then in general this equation has no solutions that meet the impenetrable boundary conditions; this is just an example of the problem mentioned in § 2.2, and indicates that the velocity constraint is degenerate for this choice of boundary conditions.…”
Section: The Constrained Fluid Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations