2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magellanic satellites in ΛCDM cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of the Local Group

Abstract: We use the APOSTLE ΛCDM cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of the Local Group to study the recent accretion of massive satellites into the halo of Milky Way (MW)-sized galaxies. These systems are selected to be close analogues to the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), the most massive satellite of the MW. The simulations allow us to address, in a cosmological context, the impact of the Clouds on the MW, including the contribution of Magellanic satellites to the MW satellite population, and the constraints plac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 shows the predictions for the satellite population of isolated dwarf galaxies with stellar mass comparable to that of the LMC (M * ∼ 3 × 10 9 M ) , or, more precisely, dwarf primaries inhabiting halos with V200 in the range 50 to 100 km/s. This is consistent with the virial mass range (2.5 < M200/10 10 M < 45) of galaxies with comparable stellar mass in the APOSTLE simulations (see; e.g., Santos-Santos et al 2021). These authors use kinematic information to identify LMC-associated dwarfs; their list of most likely LMC satellites include 7 satellites: the SMC, Hydrus 1, Horologium 1, Carina 3, Tucana 4, Reticulum 2, and Phoenix 2 (dashed black line).…”
Section: Satellites Of Isolated Lmc-like Dwarfssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 shows the predictions for the satellite population of isolated dwarf galaxies with stellar mass comparable to that of the LMC (M * ∼ 3 × 10 9 M ) , or, more precisely, dwarf primaries inhabiting halos with V200 in the range 50 to 100 km/s. This is consistent with the virial mass range (2.5 < M200/10 10 M < 45) of galaxies with comparable stellar mass in the APOSTLE simulations (see; e.g., Santos-Santos et al 2021). These authors use kinematic information to identify LMC-associated dwarfs; their list of most likely LMC satellites include 7 satellites: the SMC, Hydrus 1, Horologium 1, Carina 3, Tucana 4, Reticulum 2, and Phoenix 2 (dashed black line).…”
Section: Satellites Of Isolated Lmc-like Dwarfssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The first panel additionally shows the satellite stellar mass function of MW-mass analogs observed as part of the SAGA survey(Mao et al 2020). For the case of the LMC, we show model results assuming V 200 = 50 (colored, solid) as well as 100 (colored, long-dashed) km/s, compared to likely Magellanic satellites according toSantos-Santos et al (2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While group infall does not seem to play a role in the tidal stripping of these dwarfs, which can be seen to start occurring only after infall, we note it here as a plausible mechanism of 'pre-processing' a satellite galaxy, prior to it crossing the virial radius of the host. Santos-Santos et al ( 2021 ) have shown that Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)-like objects are twice as likely in Local Group-like environments (14 out of 24 host galaxies in APOSTLE have an LMC analogue) than in isolated galaxies. Pre-processed satellites of LMC-like objects can ultimately contribute to the dwarf population in the Milky Way.…”
Section: The DI V Erse F Ormation Histories Of F Ornax Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a dynamical association, group infall does not seem to be a suitable explanation for their similarities in orbital planes. Note, however, that other recent works-while also concluding that an association with the LMC of these two dwarf galaxies, particularly of Fornax, is unlikely-cannot firmly rule out such an association using current data [51,121].…”
Section: Group Infallmentioning
confidence: 74%