Magenschleim und Ulcusgenese (I. Mitteilung)

Riefler, F.; Schmid, J

doi:10.1159/000198854

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Such preservation of evidence before the main hearing is only possible if one of the parties requests so; preservation of evidence during the main hearing is possible on application as well ex officio. 288 The preservation of evidence is regulated in § § 384-389 ZPO and is only provided for certain means of proof, namely evidence by inspection, witnesses, and experts. 289 Also, the preservation of evidence is only admissible if there is a special interest of the applicant.…”

Section: Preservation Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence in Civil Law - Austria

Nunner-Krautgasser¹,

Anzenberger

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Način dostopa (URL): http://books.lex-localis.press/evidenceincivillaw/austria ISBN 978-961-6842-44-0 (epub) 1. Anzenberger, Philipp 281102080Price: free copy This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. ABSTRACT This report outlines the rules on the taking and using of evidence in Austrian civil procedure law. On the basis of principles such as the free disposition of parties, the attenuated inquisitorial principle or the principles of orality and directness, the judge and the parties form a "working group" when investigating the matter in dispute. The Austrian concept of an active judge, however, goes along with the judge's duty to do case-management and especially to induce a truthful fact-finding using judicial discretion. While only five means of proof (documents, witnesses, expert opinions, evidence by inspection and the examination of parties) are explicitly listed the Austrian civil procedure code, there is no numerus clausus regarding the means of evidence. Evidence may be freely assessed by the judge. Evidence in Civil Law

show abstract

Section: Preservation Of Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence in Civil Law - Austria

Nunner-Krautgasser¹,

Anzenberger

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A legtöbb szerz ő véleménye, hogy kis adagban, a szokásos m ennyiség 1/10-óben intracután alk alm az o tt vaccina csökkent reactió m ellett a nagy adag o k b an nyújtott subcután v accinálással azonos értékű az agglutinatió é s a vé dő -kísérlet eredményei szerint (61,62,63,64 (65) azon a nézeten van egérvédő kísérletek eredményei alapjá n, hogy in tra c u tá n befecskendezett kis vaccinamennyiségek priruaer immunizálás esetén alacsonyabb fokú védettséghez vezetnek, mint a subcután beoltott teljes vaccinaadag, de a revaccinálásihoz 0,1 ml intracután bevitt vaccina épp oly hatásos, m int a subcután be oltott n a g y a d ag ú vaccina.…”

Section: Im M Unizáló M óDszerekunclassified

“…Ezek szerint notrnális egyéneknél a nyák »H« anyag ta rta lm a m aga sabb, m int ugyanolyan m ennyiségű gyomornedvnek. U lcusosoknál a nyák histam inm egkötő képessége je lentő sen csökken; antihistam in ezt a kötő képességet norm alizálná (65).…”

Section: A Gyom Orm Ucin Szerepeunclassified