2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16242-8_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magically Constraining the Inverse Method Using Dynamic Polarity Assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The closest related work to the present paper is on dynamic polarity assignment [5] in the inverse method. The main goal of that paper is similar -to use the inverse method to perform proof search in such a way that forward reasoning is guaranteed to terminate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The closest related work to the present paper is on dynamic polarity assignment [5] in the inverse method. The main goal of that paper is similar -to use the inverse method to perform proof search in such a way that forward reasoning is guaranteed to terminate.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main goal of that paper is similar -to use the inverse method to perform proof search in such a way that forward reasoning is guaranteed to terminate. There are, however, substantial differences: the input in [5] is a collection of Horn clauses that is assumed to be both mode-correct and terminating on all well-moded queries. In constrast, our method does not require anything apart from the presence of forward subsumption.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the subformula property, which is the sine qua non of automation; and second, polarity and focusing, wherein the ordinary sequent rules coalesce into synthetic "macro" forms to make larger logical steps without sacrificing completeness [1]. The careful use of focusing enables a general search strategy to implement a wide variety of operational strategies directly [8,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%