1993
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8141(93)90094-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magmatic strains and foliation triple points of the Merrimac plutons, northern Sierra Nevada, California: implications for pluton emplacement and timing of subduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2 [footnote 1]), can be interpreted as a differentiation sequence from diorite at the bottom (or southern) part of the eastern pluton to tonalite at the top (northern part of eastern pluton), or perhaps as emplacement of compositionally diverse magmas adjacent to each other. Such an orientation of compositions suggests a regional top orientation to the northeast, as has been documented by Guglielmo (1993b) based on compositional asymmetry and a slight east to northeast plunge of the poles of magmatic foliation planes for the other two plutons.…”
Section: ■ Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S2 [footnote 1]), can be interpreted as a differentiation sequence from diorite at the bottom (or southern) part of the eastern pluton to tonalite at the top (northern part of eastern pluton), or perhaps as emplacement of compositionally diverse magmas adjacent to each other. Such an orientation of compositions suggests a regional top orientation to the northeast, as has been documented by Guglielmo (1993b) based on compositional asymmetry and a slight east to northeast plunge of the poles of magmatic foliation planes for the other two plutons.…”
Section: ■ Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, in light of the geochronologic data and refinement of contacts between the most mafic eastern pluton and slightly less mafic northern pluton, we posit instead that the southern pluton partially molded itself to the already crystallized contacts of the northern and eastern plutons. The absence of solid-state deformation within the plutons and along the contact between the three main plutons (Guglielmo, 1993a(Guglielmo, , 1993b, combined with wall rocks wrapping around the plutons (Hietanen, 1976) and brecciation and stoping along discordant contacts between the plutons and the wall rocks, still suggests forceful rather than passive emplacement. However, regional structure likely provided the pathway for that emplacement, particularly where dikes extend ~5 km into the country rock along and parallel to the westward projection of the contact between the northern and southern plutons (Hietanen, 1951, p. 593), which in turn is parallel to the structures in the country rock.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c). Formation of such a triple point requires that the wall rocks were still ductile at the time of pluton emplacement (Guglielmo 1993). Indeed, new Ar-Ar ages from the Angavo shear zones point to temperatures well above 500(C at that time (Gre ´goire et al 2008).…”
Section: Pluton-related Strain Vs Tectonic Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Question marks, areas of no data. The three insets show the cleavage patterns and relationships of the Bear Mountains Fault system (BMFS) (equals BB + WC + BMFZ in a) near three plutons as follows: (A) 142 Ma Merrimac pluton showing magmatic foliation pattern in pluton, deflection of regional fabrics in aureole and associated fabric ellipsoids (after Guglielmo, 1993); (B) > 138 Ma (three ages = K/Ar cooling ages) Rocklyn‐Penryn pluton with magmatic foliation traces in pluton, syn‐emplacement cleavage patterns in host rock and outline of BMFS (after H. Yu & S. R. Paterson, unpublished mapping 1994); (C) 151 Ma Guadalupe Igneous Complex (GIC) showing internal contacts (after Best, 1963) and host rock bedding, cleavage traces and outline of BMFS (after Paterson et al ., 1991). Timing relationships around each pluton indicate that the regional cleavage post‐dates the GIC, and is syn‐emplacement around the other two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%