Himalaya, Dynamics of a Giant 2 2023
DOI: 10.1002/9781394228621.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magmatism in the Kohistan–Ladakh Paleo‐arc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plate tectonic reconstructions during the past ∼150 Ma are seemingly very well understood across the globe, except when dealing with the evolution and closure of the Neo‐Tethys Ocean. Several competing and mutually exclusive hypotheses have emerged on this front in the past decade, which involve many plate boundary configurations having been proposed by previous workers, for example, based on paleomagnetic data (e.g., van Hinsbergen et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2021), field relations and structural constraints (e.g., Searle, 2018) or magmatism (e.g., L. Ding et al., 2003; Rolland et al., 2023). Here, we present geochronologic and geochemical data from Late Cretaceous meta‐igneous rocks exposed in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis (EHS), and demonstrate that they have geochemical affinity to arc‐type magmatic protoliths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plate tectonic reconstructions during the past ∼150 Ma are seemingly very well understood across the globe, except when dealing with the evolution and closure of the Neo‐Tethys Ocean. Several competing and mutually exclusive hypotheses have emerged on this front in the past decade, which involve many plate boundary configurations having been proposed by previous workers, for example, based on paleomagnetic data (e.g., van Hinsbergen et al., 2012; Yuan et al., 2021), field relations and structural constraints (e.g., Searle, 2018) or magmatism (e.g., L. Ding et al., 2003; Rolland et al., 2023). Here, we present geochronologic and geochemical data from Late Cretaceous meta‐igneous rocks exposed in the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis (EHS), and demonstrate that they have geochemical affinity to arc‐type magmatic protoliths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%