ObjectiveCardiac arrhythmias are a common challenge following open-heart surgeries.
Hypomagnesemia is believed to be correlated with this condition.
Prophylactic intravenous magnesium supplementation has been practiced for a
long time in patients undergoing CABG. This study was designed in an attempt
to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous routes
in the prevention of hypomagnesemia and arrhythmia.MethodsIn this interventional clinical study, 82 patients were randomly assigned to
2 groups. All patients were evaluated for baseline serum magnesium level and
arrhythmias. One group received 1,600 mg of oral magnesium hydroxide through
nasogastric (NG) tube prior to surgery, while the other group received 2 g
of magnesium sulfate during the induction of anesthesia. The serum magnesium
level was monitored for 48 hours after the operation. The difference in
preoperative hypomagnesemia was non-significant (Sig: 0.576).ResultsDuring the operation, the serum magnesium level peaked around 4 mg/dL, and no
hypomagnesemia was detected in any patient. Although the curve of oral group
declined parallel and below that of intravenous (IV) group, no significant
differences were detected during postoperative monitoring. In addition, a
prevalence of arrhythmia of 13.9% and 6.5% was noticed in IV and oral
groups, respectively (OR: 0.428).ConclusionProviding 1,600 mg of oral magnesium supplement to patients is as effective
as 2,000 mg of magnesium sulfate IV in preventing hypomagnesemia and
arrhythmia after CABG. Thus, the authors introduce this treatment regimen as
a promising and cost-effective method.