1968
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)90464-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnesium/Calcium Ratio in Urine of Patients With Renal Stones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ca/Mg ratio is considered to be of a higher prognostic value for stone formation than the absolute calcium and magnesium concentrations [9,18]. A relative calcium excess, as well as a relative magnesium deficiency in the urine are recognized more easily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ca/Mg ratio is considered to be of a higher prognostic value for stone formation than the absolute calcium and magnesium concentrations [9,18]. A relative calcium excess, as well as a relative magnesium deficiency in the urine are recognized more easily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calcium/magnesium quotient has frequently been used in the biochemical evaluation of stone formers [12][13][14][15] but, as is evident from the results in figures 7 and 8, this quotient is not an appropriate estimate of the risk of developing supersaturated urine. The usefulness of the calcium/magnesium quotient has also been questioned by others [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 of our patients (group II) showed relative hypomagnesuria [3,5]. The slope of the correlation in the group was 0.325 for HA and 0.332 for HR -statistically not different from that of their normomagnesuric conterpart.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%