2004
DOI: 10.1086/421969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetar Spin‐Down, Hyperenergetic Supernovae, and Gamma‐Ray Bursts

Abstract: The Kelvin-Helmholtz cooling epoch, lasting tens of seconds after the birth of a neutron star in a successful core-collapse supernova, is accompanied by a neutrino-driven wind. For magnetar-strength ($10 15 G) large-scale surface magnetic fields, this outflow is magnetically dominated during the entire cooling epoch. Because the strong magnetic field forces the wind to corotate with the proto-neutron star, this outflow can significantly affect the neutron star's early angular momentum evolution, as in analogou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
502
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(512 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(160 reference statements)
10
502
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expanding upon this and a number of authors have suggested that magnetars may power superluminous type II and Ibc SNe (Thompson et al 2004;Woosley 2010;Kasen & Bildsten 2010;Gal-Yam 2012;Quimby et al 2011); indeed the 7.29 M progenitor model of Woosley (2010) is directly motivated by the presence of J1647-45 within Wd1. Moreover, Inserra et al (2013) studied the late-time lightcurves of five superluminous type Ic SNe, finding that the data are indeed consistent with these events being powered by the rapid spin-down of newly born magnetars (see also McCrum et al 2013;Nicholl et al 2013) Additionally, magnetars have also been proposed as the central engines of some gamma-ray bursts (GRBs; e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Expanding upon this and a number of authors have suggested that magnetars may power superluminous type II and Ibc SNe (Thompson et al 2004;Woosley 2010;Kasen & Bildsten 2010;Gal-Yam 2012;Quimby et al 2011); indeed the 7.29 M progenitor model of Woosley (2010) is directly motivated by the presence of J1647-45 within Wd1. Moreover, Inserra et al (2013) studied the late-time lightcurves of five superluminous type Ic SNe, finding that the data are indeed consistent with these events being powered by the rapid spin-down of newly born magnetars (see also McCrum et al 2013;Nicholl et al 2013) Additionally, magnetars have also been proposed as the central engines of some gamma-ray bursts (GRBs; e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This is expected because outflows with larger θ contribute a greater fraction of the total open solid angle of the magnetosphere and, to a lesser extent, because the mass loss rate per unit surface area is enhanced by magneto-centrifugal acceleration for larger θ ( Thompson et al 2004;Metzger et al 2007). …”
Section: Variation In Wind Properties Across the Magnetospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The birth of millisecond magnetars may also give rise to collimated relativistic jets, which in some cases are sufficiently powerful to break out of the progenitor stars and may power gamma-ray bursts (GRB; Usov 1992; Thompson et al 2004;Bucciantini et al 2008; Figure 11. Time-averaged mass fractions of α−particles, free neutrons and free protons in proto-magnetar winds.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Burst Engines and Uhecr Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations