2017
DOI: 10.1111/andr.12372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic‐activated cell sorting before density gradient centrifugation improves recovery of high‐quality spermatozoa

Abstract: Recent studies have evaluated the use of magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) to reduce apoptotic spermatozoa and improve sperm quality. However, the efficiency of using MACS alone, before or after sperm processing by density gradient centrifugation (DGC) has not yet been established. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal protocol of MACS in assisted reproduction techniques (ART). Thus, we compared sperm quality obtained by DGC alone (DGC), DGC followed by MACS (DGC-MACS), MACS followed by DG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Cakar et al (2016) did not find significant differences in any of the analysis of sperm quality, including DNA fragmentation, by using AV-MACS, SU, DG, SU/AV-MACS, and DG/AV-MACS, perhaps due to the low sample size of the study. In contrast, Berteli et al (2017) found a better quality in terms of motility and DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa selected by AV-MACS followed by DCG than with the other combinations tested: DCG and AV-MACS alone or DCG followed by AV-MACS. Similar to these results, Zhang et al (2018) reported that the combination of DCG followed by AV-MACS in immotile sperm samples resulted in the recovery of a sperm population with lower DNA fragmentation compared to DGC alone.…”
Section: Sperm Selection Based On Membrane Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Cakar et al (2016) did not find significant differences in any of the analysis of sperm quality, including DNA fragmentation, by using AV-MACS, SU, DG, SU/AV-MACS, and DG/AV-MACS, perhaps due to the low sample size of the study. In contrast, Berteli et al (2017) found a better quality in terms of motility and DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa selected by AV-MACS followed by DCG than with the other combinations tested: DCG and AV-MACS alone or DCG followed by AV-MACS. Similar to these results, Zhang et al (2018) reported that the combination of DCG followed by AV-MACS in immotile sperm samples resulted in the recovery of a sperm population with lower DNA fragmentation compared to DGC alone.…”
Section: Sperm Selection Based On Membrane Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…As the correlation between DNA damage and apoptosis with the consequent externalisation of phosphatidylserine is well established (Muratori et al, 2003), it is no surprise that several studies reported that the spermatozoa retrieved with MACS have reduced levels of DNA fragmentation (Berteli, Da Broi, Martins, Ferriani, & Navarro, 2017;Lee et al, 2010;Rawe et al, 2009;Said et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2018). In addition, the retrieved spermatozoa exhibit higher motility (Romany et al, 2014;Said et al, 2005Said et al, , 2006 and higher percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology (Berteli et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2018). Although with MACS protocol it is possible to obtain better spermatozoa, the published data concerning clinical outcomes in ART are still inconclusive.…”
Section: Magnetic-activated Cell Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MACS was used to separate sperm into 2 populations: an annexin V (-) fraction (spermatozoa without EPS) and an annexin V (+) fraction (spermatozoa with EPS) (de Vantéry Arrighi et al 2009;Grunewald et al 2009;Huang et al 2009;Buzzi et al 2010). This is a very simple, specific and rapid technique which is known to reduce a large proportion of apoptotic spermatozoa in the processed samples (Said et al 2006), and also to reduce the level of DNA fragmentation (Rawe et al 2009;Lee et al 2010;Herrero et al 2012;Delbes et al 2013;Nadalini et al 2014;Troya & Zorrilla 2015;Berteli et al 2017). As a consequence, spermatozoa that have undergone abortive apoptosis should be retained in the column when using annexin V coupled with MACS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%