1969
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.183.645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic and Nuclear-Resonance Properties of Single-Crystal Scandium

Abstract: Magnetic-susceptibility, magnetic-anisotropy, and nuclear-magnetic-resonance measurements were performed on single-crystal scandium samples from 4.2 to 300°K. The susceptibility of single-crystal scandium is greater along the a axis than along the c axis. The nuclear relaxation rate {TiT)~l has a sin 2 0 dependence on the angle between the static magnetic field and the crystallographic c axis. The orbital hyperfine interaction is the major contribution to the relaxation rate. From the experimental results, val… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic susceptibility of scandium single crystals has been measured by three investigators, Savitskii et al (1967), Ross et al (1969) and Spedding and Croat (1973). The results of Savitskii et al (1967) differ from the other two in that (1) the α-axis susceptibility is smaller than that of the c-axis;…”
Section: Single Crystal Scandiummentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The magnetic susceptibility of scandium single crystals has been measured by three investigators, Savitskii et al (1967), Ross et al (1969) and Spedding and Croat (1973). The results of Savitskii et al (1967) differ from the other two in that (1) the α-axis susceptibility is smaller than that of the c-axis;…”
Section: Single Crystal Scandiummentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Volkenshtein and Galoshina (1963) gave a chemical analysis for their sample, but Ross and Isaacs (1971) did not. Resistivity measurements would suggest the samples have similar impurity levels, but magnetic susceptibility data for the former indicate that their sample is of poor quality, while for the latter [as given in other papers, e.g., Ross et al (1969)] suggest that the sample of Ross and Isaacs is probably better than that of Volkenshtein and Galoshina. The results of Ross and Isaacs (1971) are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Hall Coefficient and Magnetoresistancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Вважається [28], що це може бути результатом тривало існуючих 38 С. М. СІЧКАР спінових флюктуацій, які пригнічують утворення Куперових пар. Магнетна сприйнятливість Sc і Y також сильно збільшена (порівняно з іншими елементами з нульовою температурою пере-ходу у надпровідний стан) і змінюється майже по закону Кюрі коли T зменшується [29]. Ці зауваження відносяться в рівній мі-рі до Pd, і тому прийнято вважати [28], що спінові флуктуації найбільш важливі на обох кінцях періоду перехідних металів, де конверсійне співвідношення, наприклад, між Т с і  el порушуєть-ся.…”
Section: скандій і ітрійunclassified
“…Figure 2a shows the anisotropic Knight shift parameter J{ax as a function of the magnetic anisotropy, X II -X.l and of the average susceptibility [11], (XII +2X I ) =3 with temperature as the implicit variable. Figure 2b shows the isotropic Knight shift plotted against the average susceptibility.…”
Section: Figure L the Experimentally Measured Magnetic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%