1974
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2220610144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Anisotropy Induced by Self‐Interstitials in Low Temperature Electron Irradiated Iron

Abstract: After irradiation, iron (l), nickel (2), o r cobalt (3) presents an important magnetic after-effect zone which anneals out at the end of the stage I of the resistivity recovery. It was attributed, either to the one-dimensional migration of the crowdion (4) which reduces the permeability by a Dietze mechanism (5), o r to the three-dimensional migration and reorientation of a split interstitial. In this case, the magnetic after effect results from a NBel mechanism (6).Magnetic torque measurements made under satu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 have been used been ignored in the past and thus delayed the correct interpretation of experimental results. From magnetic anisotropy measurements, using a torque magnetometer, Verdone et al [106] derived a reorientation enthalpy for the Stage I E defect of 0.32 AE 0.015 eV, which fits well with the more recent MAE results of Table 2.…”
Section: The Process At 110 K (Stage I)supporting
confidence: 74%
“…23 have been used been ignored in the past and thus delayed the correct interpretation of experimental results. From magnetic anisotropy measurements, using a torque magnetometer, Verdone et al [106] derived a reorientation enthalpy for the Stage I E defect of 0.32 AE 0.015 eV, which fits well with the more recent MAE results of Table 2.…”
Section: The Process At 110 K (Stage I)supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The sub-stages I D1 and I D2 have been previously ascribed to close-pair and correlated recombination, respectively. Magnetic and mechanical relaxation measurements [16,17] conducted in the temperature range of both of these stages have indicated similar activation energies of ∼ 0.3 eV in close agreement with the results of [4]. Thus, in order to provide a most simple and unifying model description, we employ a single activation energy, equal to E m , to both of these stages.…”
Section: Integration Of Equations In Isochronal Annealing Conditionssupporting
confidence: 61%