2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.10.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic anisotropy of YFe3 compound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hard-axis magnetization curve does not reach the same maximum value as the easy-axis curve above µ0Ha, due to anisotropy of the magnetic moment. This observed difference of the easy and hard axes magnetization values above the anisotropy field indicates a possible anisotropy of the magnetization, as has been reported for different rare-earth transition-meal systems [92][93][94]. Additionally, the low field region of the hard axis measurements shows non-linear behavior which is due to the formation of twins in the "single-crystals".…”
Section: Single Crystals and Intrinsic Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The hard-axis magnetization curve does not reach the same maximum value as the easy-axis curve above µ0Ha, due to anisotropy of the magnetic moment. This observed difference of the easy and hard axes magnetization values above the anisotropy field indicates a possible anisotropy of the magnetization, as has been reported for different rare-earth transition-meal systems [92][93][94]. Additionally, the low field region of the hard axis measurements shows non-linear behavior which is due to the formation of twins in the "single-crystals".…”
Section: Single Crystals and Intrinsic Magnetic Propertiessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In such a case, the slope and intercept of an H/M vs M 2 plot will correspond to , respectively [21]. The applicability of the Sucksmith and Thompson method to various magneto-crystalline anisotropy scheme has been confirmed from modelling studies [22] and used in different materials with a combination of easy plane and hard c axis [23,24]. Beside systematic error, due to the significant relative error on magnetization, the differences between maxima and minima for the intercepts and slopes of H in /M vs (μ 0 M) 2 linear fits are large too, resulting in sizable uncertainties on K 1 and K 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Second, different degree of quenching of the orbital angular momentum of 3d atoms in different crystallographic directions [2]. The phenomenon is especially remarkable for high anisotropy intermetallic compounds based on R-T systems where R is a rare earth element and T is a 3d transition metal [3][4][5][6][7]. The magnetization anisotropy can be quantitatively characterized by a dimensionless parameter [3]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the following can be written 𝑀 𝑠 (𝐻) = 𝑀 𝑠 (0) + 𝜒𝐻 as a first approximation that was named as a paraprocess by Akulov [8]. However, for the processing of magnetization curves using, for example, a numeric technique [4] or the modified Sucksmith-Thompson method [5], it is not sufficient to simply obtain MEA and MHA; the angular dependence of saturation magnetization should also be known. It is usually assumed that the parameter p is small, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%