1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1992.tb00126.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic anomaly lineations from Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous in the west-central Pacific Ocean

Abstract: S U M M A R YLate Jurassic to Early Cretaceous (Mesozoic) magnetic anomaly lineations (the Phoenix, Magellan, Mid-Pacific Mountains, Hawaiian and Japanese lineation sets) with fracture zones in the west-central Pacific Ocean were identified more comprehensively than in any previous studies. We fixed 2100 positions of identified magnetic anomalies based on magnetic data of 283 cruise tracks. Two remarkable fracture zones, the Phoenix and Central Pacific Fracture Zones, were mapped and newly named. Our newly ide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
144
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
144
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pn anisotropy in both the eastern and western arrays has been estimated to be 8-10 per cent by using high frequency phases generated by earthquakes in the western Pacific trenches (Shintaku et al 2014). The seafloor in the eastern array, where we estimated azimuthal anisotropy in this study, has a high half spreading rate of ∼5 cm yr -1 (Nakanishi et al 1989(Nakanishi et al , 1992Müller et al 2008). The presence of strong azimuthal anisotropy is, therefore, not surprising in this region.…”
Section: Azimuthal Anisotropy and Lateral Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pn anisotropy in both the eastern and western arrays has been estimated to be 8-10 per cent by using high frequency phases generated by earthquakes in the western Pacific trenches (Shintaku et al 2014). The seafloor in the eastern array, where we estimated azimuthal anisotropy in this study, has a high half spreading rate of ∼5 cm yr -1 (Nakanishi et al 1989(Nakanishi et al , 1992Müller et al 2008). The presence of strong azimuthal anisotropy is, therefore, not surprising in this region.…”
Section: Azimuthal Anisotropy and Lateral Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The region has the oldest identifiable magnetic anomalies in the Pacific, ∼150-160 Ma, and is in an area not affected by subsequent Cretaceous intraplate volcanism (Nakanishi et al 1989(Nakanishi et al , 1992. We exploit the crystalographic properties of olivine which display lattice preferred orientation (LPO) in response to shear in the uppermost mantle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jurassic M-series magnetic lineations are located northwest of Resolution Guyot, which is on a line with lineation M23 (Nakanishi et al, 1989). This might imply that the age of the lithosphere beneath Resolution can be extrapolated to be 154 Ma (using the time scale of Kent and Gradstein, 1985).…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might imply that the age of the lithosphere beneath Resolution can be extrapolated to be 154 Ma (using the time scale of Kent and Gradstein, 1985). On the other hand, lineations M0-M4 have been tentatively identified just west of Allison Guyot (Nakanishi et al,1992), implying that a large age discontinuity exists, perhaps a fracture zone offset, beneath, or at the northwest margin of, the Mid-Pacific Mountains; thus, an extrapolated lithospheric age for Resolution must be interpreted with caution. An 80-in.…”
Section: 0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Japanese Lineation set, which is a Mesozoic magnetic anomaly lineation, exists in the East Mariana Basin, east of the Mariana Trench (Nakanishi et al 1992a), leading Nakanishi et al (1992b) to propose that the subducting plate along the southern part of the Mariana Trench is a part of the Pacific plate formed in the Mesozoic. The Japanese Lineation set has two strikes.…”
Section: Topographic Features Around the Challenger Deepmentioning
confidence: 99%