2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/698/1/922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Braking and Protostellar Disk Formation: Ambipolar Diffusion

Abstract: It is established that the formation of rotationally supported disks during the main accretion phase of star formation is suppressed by a moderately strong magnetic field in the ideal MHD limit. Non-ideal MHD effects are expected to weaken the magnetic braking, perhaps allowing the disk to reappear. We concentrate on one such effect, ambipolar diffusion, which enables the field lines to slip relative to the bulk neutral matter. We find that the slippage does not sufficiently weaken the braking to allow rotatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
186
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
186
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When α = 90 • , we find that disks may form for smaller values of μ, as long as μ > 2−3, and for even lower values of μ, disk formation does not seem to be possible. Nevertheless, for these highly magnetized configurations, the question of whether a disk may form at later times, or because of non-ideal MHD effects (Hosking & Whitworth 2004;Machida et al 2008;Mellon & Li 2009), remains unanswered. We recall that although Belloche et al (2002) observe a significant amount of rotation in the envelope of IRAM04191, they exclude a disk of size larger than 20 AU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When α = 90 • , we find that disks may form for smaller values of μ, as long as μ > 2−3, and for even lower values of μ, disk formation does not seem to be possible. Nevertheless, for these highly magnetized configurations, the question of whether a disk may form at later times, or because of non-ideal MHD effects (Hosking & Whitworth 2004;Machida et al 2008;Mellon & Li 2009), remains unanswered. We recall that although Belloche et al (2002) observe a significant amount of rotation in the envelope of IRAM04191, they exclude a disk of size larger than 20 AU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations (e.g., Machida et al 2005;Banerjee & Pudritz 2006) find that even for modest values of the magnetic intensity, disk formation can be suppressed by magnetic braking (Shu et al 1987;Mouschovias 1991;Basu & Mouschovias 1995;Galli et al 2006) which transports angular momentum from the inner parts of the cloud towards its outer regions (Allen et al 2003;Fromang et al 2006;Price & Bate 2007;Hennebelle & Fromang 2008, hereafter HF08;Mellon & Li 2008, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambipolar diffusion (e.g. Mellon & Li 2009;Duffin & Pudritz 2009), however, does not result in the formation of Keplerian discs in the earliest phase of protostellar evolution. Furthermore, including Ohmic dissipation seems to allow only for very small (∼ 10 solar radii) rotationally supported structures (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the angular momentum that could lead to the formation of a disk thin enough for fragmentation to occur is transferred by magnetic braking and the protostellar outflow (see, §4). Thus, in a strongly magnetized cloud, no thin disk appears (Mellon & Li 2009) and, therefore, no fragmentation occurs. Figure 1 shows the rotation and magnetic field conditions under 68 Masahiro N. Machida Inside the purple surfaces, the flow is outflowing from the central object (the first core or protostar), and outside the purple surface (in the blue regions), the flow is inflowing to the central object.…”
Section: Fragmentation and Binary Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%