2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic characterization of chitosan–magnetite nanocomposite films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this equation, and using the diffraction signal corresponding to the (311) plane of the diffraction pattern of NPs powder, the crystallite size was calculated as 9.3 nm, a value that is closer to the values obtained in previous works [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this equation, and using the diffraction signal corresponding to the (311) plane of the diffraction pattern of NPs powder, the crystallite size was calculated as 9.3 nm, a value that is closer to the values obtained in previous works [18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)supporting
confidence: 78%
“…NPs have been incorporated recently with success in different polymeric matrices leading to novel materials with potential applications in, for example, biomedicine, biotechnology and materials science [1][2][3][4][5][6][18][19][20][21][22]. However, only a few works relate to the addition of magnetite NPs to a segmented polyurethane matrix and the effect of the nanoparticles on the structural and functional properties of the nanocomposites [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods of synthesis lead to different degrees of interaction of the particles with the matrix and the amount of plasticizer that can be retained into the film. The synthesis of magnetic particles and posterior incorporation into the chitosan solution could lead to a weaker interaction between matrix and particles/clusters than the "in situ" synthesis [24] and in this way; the magnetic entities would be freer to react in the presence of an external magnetic field. In addition, this last method allows a better control of the amount of plasticizer required in the films that can significantly affect some specific properties (for example, mechanical properties) in comparison with that of the nanocomposite films prepared by the "in situ" method.…”
Section: -This Information Was Included In This Revised Version Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These nanoparticles also cause secondary pollution to the environment due to their very minute dimensions (Li et al, 2017). On the other hand, we prepared and characterized thoroughly composite films made from magnetic iron oxides nanoparticles and chitosan by different, but relatively simple and cost-effective obtaining procedures Kloster, Muraca et al, 2015;Kloster et al, 2018). These films can perform as convenient and efficient natural polymer-based adsorbents, without the drawbacks associated to nano-particulate loose systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%