2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11806-007-0085-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic detection method for seabed cable in marine engineering surveying

Abstract: The detection and identification of the seabed cable is becoming an important task in the marine engineering. The features of the magnetic anomaly can be used to detect the existence of the seabed cable. The magnetic field model is presented, and the consistency of the magnetic anomaly distribution between the simulation of the model and the observed data is verified. The comparison shows that the seabed cable can be effectively detected and identified with reasonable method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the recognition of SCMA signals mainly relies on manual methods [1][2][3]. The main challenges of manual methods are the lack of real-time processing options, heavy processing workload and slow processing speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the recognition of SCMA signals mainly relies on manual methods [1][2][3]. The main challenges of manual methods are the lack of real-time processing options, heavy processing workload and slow processing speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-bottom profilers are used across shallow and deep oceanic waters with several applications, such as sea-level studies (e.g., Bastos et al, 2010;Koša, 2015;Aquino da Silva et al, 2016;Yoo et al, 2016), sedimentation process (e.g., Miller et al, 2013;Alves and de Mahiques, 2019), gas seeps (e.g., Benites et al, 2015;Michel et al, 2017), geomorphology (e.g., Jobe et al, 2011;Gomes et al, 2016), and others. Marine magnetometer data have also been used for most various studies, as archeological (Boyce et al, 2004), environmental (Boyce et al, 2001), engineering (Yu et al, 2007), and geological, mainly for mineral exploration (Dehler and Potter, 2002) and academic purposes (Müller et al, 1997). Combining both techniques enhances considerably the possibilities of geological and oceanographic interpretation, as multi-data surveys in marine environments allow complementary studies (e.g., Kadima et al, 2011;Demir et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%