2006
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.75.094201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Dipole Strength and the T = 0 Proton–Neutron Residual Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent computational progress allows shell-model studies of the M 1 strength in large model spaces to describe details of the fragmentation of the mode. For example, unrestricted calculations in the full f p model space are possible now for 46,48 Ti (Fearick et al, 2006). As an example of the state-of-the-art, a study of the stable N = 28 isotones 48 Ca, 50 Ti, 52 Cr, 54 Fe (Langanke et al, 2004) is discussed, whose experimental M 1 strength distributions have been measured in great detail (Sober et al, 1985;Steffen et al, 1980).…”
Section: B Theoretical Description: the Shell Model And Random Phase ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent computational progress allows shell-model studies of the M 1 strength in large model spaces to describe details of the fragmentation of the mode. For example, unrestricted calculations in the full f p model space are possible now for 46,48 Ti (Fearick et al, 2006). As an example of the state-of-the-art, a study of the stable N = 28 isotones 48 Ca, 50 Ti, 52 Cr, 54 Fe (Langanke et al, 2004) is discussed, whose experimental M 1 strength distributions have been measured in great detail (Sober et al, 1985;Steffen et al, 1980).…”
Section: B Theoretical Description: the Shell Model And Random Phase ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the normalization factors diverge, if all the QRPA solutions are used for taking into account the QRPA correlations; see Eqs. (17) and (22). It is known that the QRPA ground-state energy also diverges by including all the QRPA solutions for the calculation of this energy [43].…”
Section: Application a Technical Procedures And Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of Ref. [17] showed measured B(M 1) of 46,48 Ti and compared them with shell-model results with and without the isoscalar pairing interaction. Without the isoscalar pairing interaction the calculated M 1 strengths in a low-energy region ≤ 8 MeV are not sufficient compared to the experimental data, and with that interaction the calculation results are closer to the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%