2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic domain structures and nano-string morphology of laser off-normal deposited amorphous cobalt films with controlled magnetic anisotropy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The zigzag shape is characteristic of charged domain walls that can appear in thin films with a large magnetic anisotropy where the shape serves the purpose of reducing the magnetic charge density [15,17,18]. A very coarse zigzag shape is observed in the corner domains nucleated at small negative fields, as seen in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The zigzag shape is characteristic of charged domain walls that can appear in thin films with a large magnetic anisotropy where the shape serves the purpose of reducing the magnetic charge density [15,17,18]. A very coarse zigzag shape is observed in the corner domains nucleated at small negative fields, as seen in Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In previous works, we showed that the off-normal PLD technique allowed simultaneously growing and sculpting soft magnetic nano-strings, whose direction was perpendicular to the incidence plane [10]. Our scanning tunneling microscopy, STM, showed that the width of these nano-strings could be controlled between 8 and 30 nm by selecting the off-normal angle value and the deposition time [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Our scanning tunneling microscopy, STM, showed that the width of these nano-strings could be controlled between 8 and 30 nm by selecting the off-normal angle value and the deposition time [10]. A controlled uniaxial in-plane magnetic anisotropy was then generated in the films, with values between 10 3 Jm À 3 and 10 4 Jm À 3 , depending on the deposition parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is known that changes in morphology of a layer will induce changes in the magnetic properties [43][44][45]. In our case, the magnetic field changes the surface roughness (see Section 3.2) of the deposited nickel (and maybe, the layer thickness slightly, via the influence on the current efficiency, see Section 3.1), thus inducing slight changes of the coercive field, the saturation magnetization and the residual magnetization.…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of the Deposited Layersmentioning
confidence: 82%