2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.2149349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic dynamics of simple collective modes in a two-sphere plasma model

Abstract: A plasma blob is modeled as consisting of two homogeneous spheres of equal radius and equal but opposite charge densities that can move relative to each other. Relative translational and rotational motion are considered separately. Magnetic effects from the current density caused by the relative motion are included. Magnetic interaction is seen to cause an inductive inertia. In the relative translation case the Coulomb attraction, approximately a linear force for small amplitudes, causes an oscillation. For a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also in accord with Woltjer's [52] assumption that self organized states of a plasma should correspond to maxima of magnetic energy. Mehra and De Luca [53], on the other hand, made computer simulations of a plasma minimizing the velocity space form of the Darwin energy (30). They then found surprising results indicating that anti-parallel currents attracted each other.…”
Section: On the Nature Of Magnetic Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also in accord with Woltjer's [52] assumption that self organized states of a plasma should correspond to maxima of magnetic energy. Mehra and De Luca [53], on the other hand, made computer simulations of a plasma minimizing the velocity space form of the Darwin energy (30). They then found surprising results indicating that anti-parallel currents attracted each other.…”
Section: On the Nature Of Magnetic Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of doubt the safe method is to start with the Darwin Lagrangian (11) and introduce relevant constraints and idealizations. A couple of examples of this procedure can be found in Essén [29,30]. Electromechanical systems are treated e.g.…”
Section: Electromechanical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to interpret our data, we developed a simple model in which we assume that the electron cloud moves as a whole in response to an applied external field within a Gaussian ion density distribution [25]. While this would be a poor model under many cycles of applied RF because the non-solid nature of the electron cloud will cause the cloud to de-phase, for 2-cycles it is more applicable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic interaction described by the Darwin Lagrangian is essential in relativistic many-electron calculations as noted by Breit and others [12][13][14][15]. It has found applications in nuclear physics [16,17], and especially in plasma physics, for numerical simulation [18][19][20][21][22], thermodynamics and kinetics [23][24][25][26][27], as well fundamental theory [28][29][30]. Barcons and Lapiedra [31] noted that the Darwin approach is not valid for a relativistic plasma and therefore used a different approach to its statistical mechanics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%