“…There are consistent reports that the number of elements needed for good MEC results is much less than for the FEA, computing time for MEC and analytical methods is much smaller than for FEA, and in saturation, MEC provides a better approximation than FEA. Leakage, saturation, and harmonic effects are automatically included in many MEC models by virtue of a geometry-based reluctance network [101,156,184,185]. Various authors have attempted to combine FEA and MEC to achieve even better results [159].…”