1986
DOI: 10.1063/1.1138634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic field alignment studies for the URAGAN-3 torsatron

Abstract: If the major axes of the helical and vertical field coils of a torsatron plasma confinement device are not aligned to within ∼1% of their major radii, the resulting error field can break up closed magnetic flux surfaces and reduce the effective plasma confinement volume. A novel technique for accurately locating the magnetic symmetry axes of torsatron helical and vertical coil sets to within ∼1 mm using magnetic field measurements near the device major axis (i.e., away from the confinement volume) is described… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source of this field was attributed to coil bus-work and was corrected [3]. The URAGAN-3 stellarator built on the ATF results to measure and correct error fields associated with misalignment of their vertical field coil pair [4]. The W7-AS stellarator performed extensive flux surface mapping of its configuration space finding both low and high order islands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of this field was attributed to coil bus-work and was corrected [3]. The URAGAN-3 stellarator built on the ATF results to measure and correct error fields associated with misalignment of their vertical field coil pair [4]. The W7-AS stellarator performed extensive flux surface mapping of its configuration space finding both low and high order islands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the inverse representation of MHD equilibria [12], the magnetic flux co-ordinates (p,0,f) are considered the independent variables and the cylindrical co-ordinates (R,0,Z) are the dependent variables. This is clearly the interpretation ascribed to Eqs (3) and ( 4), with the substitution </ > = c (13) All equilibrium quantities can be determined in terms of Rmn> Z m n , ±(p) and $(p). These include the magnetic field B*(p,0,f) and the stream function X(p,0,f).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Stream Functionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In this section we develop flux surface representations for a number of different stellarator configurations: ATF (operating) [9], Uragan-3 (operating) [13,14] and TJ-II (under design) [15]. The first two of these configurations have fi = 2 torsatron-type windings; essentially planar, circular magnetic axes; and relatively low rotational transform per helical field period, * /M <, 0.1.…”
Section: Representation Of Actual Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation