1994
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(94)00328-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic field dependent yield of geminate radical pair recombination in micelles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach that radicals undergo a diffusive relative motion in a short potential well can be described by the stochastic Liouville equation (SLE), in other words, we take into account for effects of attraction (or repulsion) between the radicals a and b, which includes the combined spin-space evolution of the RP out and inside of an mathematical device called micelles [7,8]. The main effect of a micelle is to confine the RP to a finite volume (cage effect, Figure 3a), approximately in spherical shape, where are kept at small and fixed relative distance for a long time due to a strong interradical interaction for their study.…”
Section: Hyperfine Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach that radicals undergo a diffusive relative motion in a short potential well can be described by the stochastic Liouville equation (SLE), in other words, we take into account for effects of attraction (or repulsion) between the radicals a and b, which includes the combined spin-space evolution of the RP out and inside of an mathematical device called micelles [7,8]. The main effect of a micelle is to confine the RP to a finite volume (cage effect, Figure 3a), approximately in spherical shape, where are kept at small and fixed relative distance for a long time due to a strong interradical interaction for their study.…”
Section: Hyperfine Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will follow the standard approach [1,[21][22][23], and take as a starting point the well-known Liouville equation P = -i[M,P] -Z s (Psp +PPs) -kP (3) where p is the spin density matrix, cW is spin Hamiltonian of the complex. The second term in Eq.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of the approach was discussed in [23]. Due to weak dependence of the reaction yield Y on Jo and Js we can set them to zero (JS = Jo = 0).…”
Section: Kinetic Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Johnson-Merrifield approximation (JMA) [5,6] reduces the problem by excluding all off-diagonal elements of the spin density matrix in the basis that diagonalizes the free Hamiltonian. Consequently it cannot describe coherent effects, such as the usual singlet triplet (Q) mixing and its applicability appears to be restricted to systems with exponential time dependences, such as micelles, and to incoherent mixing of states (relaxation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%