1989
DOI: 10.1515/zna-1989-1203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Field Distribution Measurement by the Modified FLASH Method

Abstract: Magnetic field inhomogeneities cause blurring and distortion of images gained by nuclear mag netic resonance. In order to adjust the magnetic coils finely, a precise and rapid method for measuring the magnetic field is needed. We describe a gradient echo technique of the FLASH version for mapping static magnetic fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1a) were first measured to guide positioning of the SI slice and volume of interest (VOI). The SI technique with high spatial resolution was based on an RF spoiled gradient‐echo sequence (20). The slice thickness was chosen to be 15 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a) were first measured to guide positioning of the SI slice and volume of interest (VOI). The SI technique with high spatial resolution was based on an RF spoiled gradient‐echo sequence (20). The slice thickness was chosen to be 15 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The main part of the sequence was derived from the radiofrequency (RF) spoiled gradient‐echo sequence with step increments of TE, while TR and bandwidth per pixel were kept constant (19–22). Slice selection was achieved by using the manufacturer's fat‐selective binomial 1 1 excitation pulse instead of the standard RF pulse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using ratio processing of the NMR data [17]. The second methods require more measurements but the result is in very good agreement with the reality [10][11][12][13][14]16] without any correction. Both mentioned groups of methods require good stability of the static magnetic field of the scanner and the authors assumed it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The subsequent optimization yielded values of the five variables ϕ 1shift to ϕ 5shift . Using the values the original five NMR data matrices were corrected and they were prepared for the calculations of magnetic field maps from the phase and from the position of the spectral line of water [13,16] (figure 4). Calculation of the spectrum from the five samples would provide very poor resolution; that is why the interpolation method of zero filling was used to improve the appearance of the result.…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%