2011
DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.201100106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Field Line Random Walk in Two‐dimensional Turbulence: Markovian Diffusion versus Superdiffusion

Abstract: In the present article previous work is complemented by investigating analytically the field line random walk in partially turbulent magnetic fields. By using the well-established model of two-dimensional turbulence with a general spectrum at large scales, we compute the field line diffusion coefficient for all length scales. This work will also clarify some confusion about the superdiffusive and diffusive regimes discovered earlier.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present paper, however, we focus on cases where FLRW is diffusive. We can do this by choosing q > 1 in the spectrum (7). In this case, Shalchi and Weinhorst (see…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present paper, however, we focus on cases where FLRW is diffusive. We can do this by choosing q > 1 in the spectrum (7). In this case, Shalchi and Weinhorst (see…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. 33, the authors used a spectrum which is perfectly flat in the energy range corresponding to the value q ¼ 0 in spectrum (7). For our simulations, we set q ¼ 2 corresponding to an increasing spectrum at large scale.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) is remained for z → ∞. Therefore, for z → ∞ the regime of particle transport tends to the magnetostatic result, i.e., diffusion (see Shalchi 2011).…”
Section: Analytical Formulas Of Field Line Wandering In the Range 2lmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Note that FLRW in the range σ ≪ 2l 2 2D ≪ 2L 2 2D is no longer the simple quadratic function of the parallel position z (ballistic process) as in the magnetostatic case (see Shalchi 2011). In addition, we find that the energy range index q and the inertial range index s have no any influence on the features of field line wandering.…”
Section: Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Equation (11) of Shalchi (2011a), the latter integral corresponds to the square of the field line diffusion coefficient for pure two-dimensional turbulence (see also Matthaeus et al, 1995Matthaeus et al, , 2007 …”
Section: Dominant Perpendicular Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%