2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5080093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic field stabilization system for atomic physics experiments

Abstract: Atomic physics experiments commonly use millitesla-scale magnetic fields to provide a quantization axis. As atomic transition frequencies depend on the magnitude of this field, many experiments require a stable absolute field. Most setups use electromagnets, which require a power supply stability not usually met by commercially available units. We demonstrate stabilization of a field of 14.6 mT to 4.3 nT rms noise (0.29 ppm), compared to noise of > 100 nT without any stabilization. The rms noise is measured us… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive magnetic shielding is well-suited for isolating an experiment by excluding magnetic fields from a contained volume. As opposed to active stabilisation 10,16 or dynamical decoupling 17,18 , it uses materials that have high magnetic permeability µ r and so redirect the magnetic flux lines around the enclosed volume. Different materials have different properties and utilise different shielding mechanisms: high-µ r materials screen quasi-dc fields up to a few 100 Hz by flux-shunting, while highly conductive materials cancel magnetic fields induced by eddy currents oscillating at a few kHz 19,20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive magnetic shielding is well-suited for isolating an experiment by excluding magnetic fields from a contained volume. As opposed to active stabilisation 10,16 or dynamical decoupling 17,18 , it uses materials that have high magnetic permeability µ r and so redirect the magnetic flux lines around the enclosed volume. Different materials have different properties and utilise different shielding mechanisms: high-µ r materials screen quasi-dc fields up to a few 100 Hz by flux-shunting, while highly conductive materials cancel magnetic fields induced by eddy currents oscillating at a few kHz 19,20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it was reported that a very low noise magnetic field was generated for an experiment on trapped ion system. By combining feed-forward and dynamic feedback techniques, a reduced environmental noise of 43µG, with the bias magnetic field of 146G, has also been achieved 31 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ErYb K μ (B res ) are largest for small fields, where for B<100 G we can expect many resonances with K μ (B res ) of a few hundred. Given that magnetic fields can be controlled experimentally up to about 10 −6 (active magnetic field stabilization to 0.29 ppm was recently demonstrated [82]), the positions of Feshbach resonances could constrain the variations of proton-to-electron mass ratio up to about 10 −8 -10 −9 at best. Much more useful constraints could potentially be achieved by monitoring the scattering length near a Feshbach resonance [79].…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Feshbach Spectra To Variations Of Reduced Massmentioning
confidence: 99%