2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.184501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic fields above the superconducting ferromagnet UCoGe

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the absence of external field in a ferromagnet there is an internal field H int acting on the electron charges. The internal magnetic field in all uranium superconducting ferromagnets is larger than the lower critical field H c1 (see, for instance, the paper [14]). Hence, the Meissner state is absent and the superconducting state is always the Abrikosov mixed state with space inhomogeneous distributions of the order parameter and the internal magnetic field.…”
Section: Quasiparticles Spectrum In a Ferromagnet Superconductor With...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even in the absence of external field in a ferromagnet there is an internal field H int acting on the electron charges. The internal magnetic field in all uranium superconducting ferromagnets is larger than the lower critical field H c1 (see, for instance, the paper [14]). Hence, the Meissner state is absent and the superconducting state is always the Abrikosov mixed state with space inhomogeneous distributions of the order parameter and the internal magnetic field.…”
Section: Quasiparticles Spectrum In a Ferromagnet Superconductor With...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar size of domains has been recently measured in UCoGe. [14] So, it is natural to consider these ferromagnetic superconductors as triplet superconductors similar to superfluid phases of He 3 . It must be kept in mind, however, that unlike to the liquid helium which is completely isotropic neutral Fermi liquid here we deal with superconductivity developing in strongly anisotropic ferromagnetic metals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning probe microscopy based on micro-and nano-scale superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) has attracted growing attention in recent years in a broad range of fields [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The significant technological advances in the development of versatile scanning SQUID probes and imaging methods have led to key insights into microscopic properties of superconductors [4,10,11], vortex dynamics [12][13][14][15][16], magnetism at oxide interfaces [17][18][19][20][21], edge transport and magnetism in topological states of matter [22][23][24], and dynamics of phase transitions [25]. The two main approaches to the fabrication of scanning SQUIDs are based on planar lithographic techniques [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and on self-aligned deposition on a quartz pipette, forming a SQUID-on-tip (SOT) [34][35][36][37][38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally, FM domains have been observed in UCoGe by scanning SQUID at ambient pressure, and the domain wall (DW) width was estimated to be very small, ∼ 0.1-1nm, as expected from the strong Ising anisotropy of UCoGe 12 . The magnetic flux density is changed only slightly as the system enters the FM+SC phase from the non-superconducting FM phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%