1998
DOI: 10.1109/20.717706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic flux leakage modeling for mechanical damage in transmission pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the magnetic intensity in the cross-section is not easy to detect at the surface of the pipeline. But the magnetic flux leakage at the hole hints the information of the main magnetic flux [6][7][8]. So if the values of the magnetic flux leakage of the different points in the circumference are detected, the distribution will be obtained approximately.…”
Section: The Difference Between the Traditional Mfl Methods And The Lmaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the magnetic intensity in the cross-section is not easy to detect at the surface of the pipeline. But the magnetic flux leakage at the hole hints the information of the main magnetic flux [6][7][8]. So if the values of the magnetic flux leakage of the different points in the circumference are detected, the distribution will be obtained approximately.…”
Section: The Difference Between the Traditional Mfl Methods And The Lmaimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic finite element analysis (FEA) has become a powerful modeling tool for studying MFL signals from corrosion defects [1][2][3][4]. In this paper, we apply magnetic FEA to the case of circular dents in a plate sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods described in this paper were built on Hinton's & Roweis's weight whilst using KNN. The exponential function defined in (6) will maximize the effect of the nearest neighbor to the point 02001-p. 3 that requires calibration, and by that, the interpolator will get the properties of the closest neighbor point, compared to the other surrounding points.…”
Section: Background On Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UT is known to have better sizing accuracy since absolute a Corresponding author : yaman_85@hotmail.com measurement can be obtained when compared to MFL which provides relative measurements [2]. Table 1 shows the sizing accuracy for different corrosion detection techniques [3]. As shown in Table 1, both MFL and UT technologies have certain limitations regarding the accurate measurement of the defects within the system since both devices suffer from a certain error margin depending on the device's sizing accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%