2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.184506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic flux pinning in superconductors with hyperbolic-tessellation arrays of pinning sites

Abstract: We study magnetic flux interacting with arrays of pinning sites (APS) placed on vertices of hyperbolic tesselations (HT). We show that, due to the gradient in the density of pinning sites, HT APS are capable of trapping vortices for a broad range of applied magnetic fluxes. Thus, the penetration of magnetic field in HT APS is essentially different from the usual scenario predicted by the Bean model. We demonstrate that, due to the enhanced asymmetry of the surface barrier for vortex entry/exit, this HT APS cou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the terraced vortex distribution found in a nonequilibrium (metastable) distribution of vortices in a critical state carries a direct analogy with the soliton structure derived for a 1D system of atoms adsorbed on a periodic substrate16. Also, the obtained domain structure differs fundamentally from the nonuniform vortex distribution found in17, which is generated by the nonuniform arrangement of pinning sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…For example, the terraced vortex distribution found in a nonequilibrium (metastable) distribution of vortices in a critical state carries a direct analogy with the soliton structure derived for a 1D system of atoms adsorbed on a periodic substrate16. Also, the obtained domain structure differs fundamentally from the nonuniform vortex distribution found in17, which is generated by the nonuniform arrangement of pinning sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The vortex configurations rely on the competitions between two types of vortices, the pinned vortices and the interstitial vortices, which vary with the pinning landscapes. It has attracted considerable academic attention to explore the vortex configurations in nanostructured superconductors with periodic and nonuniform pinning sites [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] (square, honeycomb, etc). Although the quantized confinement effects can be observed in the superconducting films with antidots, the confinement areas are not isolated and the strong interactions between the interstitial vortices in different confinement areas are still observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works had investigated the effects of periodic , quasi-periodic [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], and randomly distributed [49][50][51][52][53][54] pinning centers in superconducting films. For periodic pinning, such as square [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], triangular [30][31][32][33][34][35]55], honeycomb [27,29,30,38], and Kagom茅 [27-29, 32, 37], vortices tend to match the pinning lattice in commensurate patterns, which greatly enhances the critical current density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these enhancements occur at specific values of magnetic fields, resulting in high oscillations of the critical current as a function of the applied field [13,14,29,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. On the other hand, quasiperiodic arrays, such as Penrose [43,44,48], hyperbolic tessellations [47], and Archimedean tilings [41,46], show unusual commensurability effects for several values of applied magnetic fields; besides that, for a wide range of fields, the critical depinning currents are high. Recently, Ray et al [56] proposed conformal pinning arrays created by a conformal angle-preserving transformation of a regular pinning array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%