2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3202354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic force microscope tip-induced remagnetization of CoPt nanodisks with perpendicular anisotropy

Abstract: We report on the results of a magnetic force microscopy investigation of remagnetization processes in arrays of CoPt nanodisks with diameters of 35 and 200 nm and a thickness of 9.8 nm fabricated by e-beam lithography and ion etching. The controllable magnetization reversal of individual CoPt nanodisks by the magnetic force microscope ͑MFM͒ tip-induced magnetic field was demonstrated. We observed experimentally two essentially different processes of tip-induced remagnetization. Magnetization reversal of 200 nm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiment does not give values of anisotropy directly, but instead measures the remanent magnetization direction, as deduced from the stray-field distribution. The magnetization of the tip influences the magnetic state 104 and may enhance the apparent out-of-plane magnetization component. The model is itself limited by the neglect of the surface magnetoelastic anisotropy term ͑B CoCrPt-O SU ͒, which would favor magnetization along the line length, and by neglect of terms of minor magnitude such as the second-order magnetoelastic surface and bulk magnetocrystalline anisotropy terms.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment does not give values of anisotropy directly, but instead measures the remanent magnetization direction, as deduced from the stray-field distribution. The magnetization of the tip influences the magnetic state 104 and may enhance the apparent out-of-plane magnetization component. The model is itself limited by the neglect of the surface magnetoelastic anisotropy term ͑B CoCrPt-O SU ͒, which would favor magnetization along the line length, and by neglect of terms of minor magnitude such as the second-order magnetoelastic surface and bulk magnetocrystalline anisotropy terms.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, c, d). Поле зонда вначале вызывает небольшие возмущения намаг-ниченности микрополоски, а при малом расстоянии между зондом и образцом приводит к эффектам пе-ремагничивания [16]. Для рассматриваемых параметров системы критическое расстояние составляло 40 nm.…”
Section: результаты и обсуждениеunclassified
“…5 It is also possible to derive an expression for t 0 , which according to the model by Brown 6 is given by This has been measured to be 10 ns in 2-nm diameter Fe nanoparticles embedded in Ag matrices 4 and 1 ns in 35-nm diameter  10-nm thickness CoPt discs.…”
Section: The Blocking Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%