2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10497-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Force Microscopy Studies of Magnetic Features and Nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many magnetic grains participate in the formation of an interaction domain in which the grains exhibit the similar orientation of magnetization (up and/or down domains), yet the MFM phase image contrast represents magnetic-forcegradient mapping largely normal to the surface. In this case, the bright domain indicates the tip is repulsive to the spot, while the black domain indicates it is attractive [38]. So the out-of plane component of magnetization is far more significant for cobalt on chromia, than cobalt on sapphire (Al 2 O 3 ).…”
Section: In-plane Magnetic Anisotropy Of the Cobalt Adlayermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many magnetic grains participate in the formation of an interaction domain in which the grains exhibit the similar orientation of magnetization (up and/or down domains), yet the MFM phase image contrast represents magnetic-forcegradient mapping largely normal to the surface. In this case, the bright domain indicates the tip is repulsive to the spot, while the black domain indicates it is attractive [38]. So the out-of plane component of magnetization is far more significant for cobalt on chromia, than cobalt on sapphire (Al 2 O 3 ).…”
Section: In-plane Magnetic Anisotropy Of the Cobalt Adlayermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many magnetic grains participate in the formation of an interaction domain in which the grains exhibit the similar orientation of magnetization (up-down domains). Such domain patterns are well known to describe ferromagnetic structures [13]. Magnetic measurement results also indicate that all the samples are ferromagnetic at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…It is easy to define the average domain size for simple domain configurations by visual methods. But for the complicated irregular interaction domains the magnetic correlation length (the average domain width) can be estimated by several methods [13][14][15][16][17]. We have used the grain-size-analysis software incorporated in our MFM system to calculate from the MFM images as an average over the lateral dimension of the domains sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 2c the image contrast is related to the stray magnetic field out of the sample56. Although the small, branching magnetic domains can be clearly identified, the presence of the maze pattern is not clear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the past decade, significant advances have been made in magnetic imaging in areas of research such as magnetic recording media12 and permanent magnets34. Magnetic domains have been imaged by magnetic force microscopy (MFM)56, scanning electron microscopy polarisation analysis (SEMPA)78, magneto-optical Kerr microscopy910, and techniques using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) ( i.e., Lorentz microscopy and electron holography)1112131415. However, despite being successfully applied to many systems, these technologies still have drawbacks (depending on the principles of experiments) such as a limited field of view, long measurement time, ultra-high vacuum conditions, and preparation of a thin-foil specimen.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%