2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic hysteresis loop technique as a tool for the evaluation of σ phase embrittlement in Fe–Cr alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ferrite phase is ferromagnetic, while austenite and chromium nitride are paramagnetic, and sigma is a nonmagnetic phase. 39,[44][45] This difference motivated the use of magnetic methods to detect deleterious phases in DSS. Figure 6 presents the impedance plane typical of EC results, while Figure 7 shows the EC results as phase angle versus the ferrite content in the DSS samples.…”
Section: Magnetic Methods Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ferrite phase is ferromagnetic, while austenite and chromium nitride are paramagnetic, and sigma is a nonmagnetic phase. 39,[44][45] This difference motivated the use of magnetic methods to detect deleterious phases in DSS. Figure 6 presents the impedance plane typical of EC results, while Figure 7 shows the EC results as phase angle versus the ferrite content in the DSS samples.…”
Section: Magnetic Methods Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, magnetic-based testing approaches can be used for testing duplex stainless steels, since these tests are sensitive to the presence and amount of the ferromagnetic ferrite phase. Mohapatra et al [19,20] showed that the remanence measurement of the magnetic hysteresis loop is able to follow the formation of the σ phase even when presented in low volume fractions. Structure-sensitive magnetic properties like coercivity and remanence are affected by microstructural modifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%