2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-098353-0.00004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M DCD (normalized over the M S of each sample) versus reverse magnetic field ( H ) for the corresponding NCs as well as the first-order differentiated curves of M DCD with respect to H (switching field distributions (SFDs)), normalized to ease the comparison, are displayed in Figures b and c, respectively; the latter represents the irreversible component of the susceptibility (χ irr ). This quantity can be viewed as a measure of the energy barrier distribution (which is associated with the distribution of particle’s switching field when we consider nanoparticle-based systems), defined as the field necessary to overcome the energy barrier during an irreversible reversal process. NC_2 and NC_5 clearly show a single reversal process of magnetization with CFO and SFO phases strongly coupled, with an intermediate H SW value compared to that of the CFO and SFO single phases, thus proving the efficiency of controlling the size and distribution of hard/soft-phase regions thanks to the synthesis method (see Figure S8 for data for all NCs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The M DCD (normalized over the M S of each sample) versus reverse magnetic field ( H ) for the corresponding NCs as well as the first-order differentiated curves of M DCD with respect to H (switching field distributions (SFDs)), normalized to ease the comparison, are displayed in Figures b and c, respectively; the latter represents the irreversible component of the susceptibility (χ irr ). This quantity can be viewed as a measure of the energy barrier distribution (which is associated with the distribution of particle’s switching field when we consider nanoparticle-based systems), defined as the field necessary to overcome the energy barrier during an irreversible reversal process. NC_2 and NC_5 clearly show a single reversal process of magnetization with CFO and SFO phases strongly coupled, with an intermediate H SW value compared to that of the CFO and SFO single phases, thus proving the efficiency of controlling the size and distribution of hard/soft-phase regions thanks to the synthesis method (see Figure S8 for data for all NCs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This quantity can be considered to be a measure of the energy barrier distribution which, in a nanoparticle system, is associated to the distribution of particle's switching field, defined as the field necessary to overcome the energy barrier during an irreversible reversal process. 39 In Fig. 7a, we show the switching field distributions (SFDs) of the nanocomposites as obtained from the first order derivatives of the M DCD curves.…”
Section: Magnetization Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The properties of magnetic nanoparticles are studied through a wide variety of approaches and techniques, among which a central role is played by DC and AC magnetization measurements. Among DC measurements, zerofield-cooled and field-cooled (ZFC/FC) magnetization curves have become an outstanding method of analysis; their presence in experimental papers is nowadays ubiquitous and the existing literature is vast [9][10][11] . As a matter of fact, FC/ZFC curves provide interesting information about a nanoparticle system: in principle, their analysis gives an estimate of the average magnetic moment of nanoparticles 12 , the distribution of nanoparticle sizes 13,14 , the dominant anisotropy energy 15,16 and the presence of interactions 17,18 responsible for ordered or disordered states at low temperatures 19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%