2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2003.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic mapping, ground penetrating radar surveys and magnetic susceptibility measurements for the study of the archaeological site of Serra di Vaglio (southern Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this aim, we used an automatic procedure, based on statistical criteria, which allows us to detect and remove the spikes from the magnetic maps (Bavusi et al, 2004;Chianese et al, 2004).…”
Section: Magneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this aim, we used an automatic procedure, based on statistical criteria, which allows us to detect and remove the spikes from the magnetic maps (Bavusi et al, 2004;Chianese et al, 2004).…”
Section: Magneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the joint application of electric and magnetic methods for the localization of buried structures has become a standard approach to solve some archaeological problems (Batmunkh et al, 2004;Chianese et al, 2004;Gaffney et al, 2004). In fact, both the electrical and magnetic techniques are nowadays widely employed for archaeological aims, because the electric method is applied to estimate the shape and the depth of buried structures (Cammarano et al, 2000;Di Fiore et al, 2002;Rizzo et al, 2005), while the magnetic method is applied to detect the presence of buried objects characterised by a magnetic susceptibility contrast in respect of the surrounding ground or with a remnant magnetisation (Aitken, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous commonly employed geophysical techniques for archaeological prospection in ancient, complex, urban sites, which describes the site core area of Pacbitun, including electric resistivity tomography or imaging (ERT/ERI) [10][11][12][13], geomagnetic mapping (GM), frequency domain electromagnetic methods (FDEM) [14][15][16][17][18][19], and GPR or georadar [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. A GPR and GM survey was deemed most appropriate for exploring two plaza areas which needed to be completed in six days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general the survey targets include the identification and mapping of buried artefacts or construction features, the localization of tombs, burial mounds, shallow graves and the reconstruction of archaeological layers (e.g. roads, walls, channels) (Vaughan, 1986;Goodman, 1994;Goodman et al, 1995;McCann, 1995;Hruska and Fuchs, 1999;Dabas et al, 2000;Piro et al, 2001;Lualdi and Zanzi, 2002;Chianese et al, 2004;Persson and Olofsson, 2004;Leucci and Negri, 2006;Leckebusch et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%