2018
DOI: 10.1088/2515-7639/aaf26d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic microstructure machine learning analysis

Abstract: We use a machine learning approach to identify the importance of microstructure characteristics in causing magnetization reversal in ideally structured large-grained Nd 2 Fe 14 B permanent magnets. The embedded Stoner-Wohlfarth method is used as a reduced order model for determining local switching field maps which guide the data-driven learning procedure. The predictor model is a random forest classifier which we validate by comparing with full micromagnetic simulations in the case of small granular test stru… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A step towards automatization of the training process could be accomplished by tuning parameters of the underlying method e.g. by cross-validation like the authors did in the models for machine learning analysis for microstructures, see [11] and references therein. However, we emphasize that such hyper-parameter tuning, such as for γ in the RBF and the scaling factors for the field magnitude and in-plane angle are not within the scope of this presentation and part of future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A step towards automatization of the training process could be accomplished by tuning parameters of the underlying method e.g. by cross-validation like the authors did in the models for machine learning analysis for microstructures, see [11] and references therein. However, we emphasize that such hyper-parameter tuning, such as for γ in the RBF and the scaling factors for the field magnitude and in-plane angle are not within the scope of this presentation and part of future investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With linear regression the data are assumed to correspond linearly, yet in real case scenarios, which are usually much more complex, labels depend nonlinearly on the features. Similar to Exl et al 18 , we use random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB) decision trees to account for the nonlinearity, which we observed in our results. RF trees combine predictions of individual decision trees trained over randomly generated sub-training samples (often called as ensemble learning).…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Predicting the coercive field directly from a microstructural image would speed up the computation tremendously. A promising approach to reduce the computational costs is the use of machine learning to predict the coercivity of permanent magnets 18 . Even if it is only a rough approximation, one can gain qualitative information of the influence of local microstructural properties on the coercivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in aforementioned papers DL CNNs were used only as a component and final analyses were still conducted using FEA. Furthermore, applying DL to assist another analysis tool possibly hinders the utilization of full potential of DL [17]- [19]. In this study, DL CNNs are used for end-to-end accurate prediction of the output of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (IPMSMs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%