2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(03)00272-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic microstructure on surface and in bulk of NANOPERM-type nanocrystalline alloys: Mössbauer effect studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error range in the determination of the relative fraction is comparable with the size of the symbols used. The results, presented in this figure, are in good agreement with the previous observations of the crystallization processes in the amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys [26][27][28][29] that the crystallization process starts on the surface at lower annealing temperature in comparison with the bulk. The temperature of the onset of (surface) crystallization was determined to be 410 • C.…”
Section: Cems and Tms Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The error range in the determination of the relative fraction is comparable with the size of the symbols used. The results, presented in this figure, are in good agreement with the previous observations of the crystallization processes in the amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys [26][27][28][29] that the crystallization process starts on the surface at lower annealing temperature in comparison with the bulk. The temperature of the onset of (surface) crystallization was determined to be 410 • C.…”
Section: Cems and Tms Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the system seems to be an appropriate candidate especially for case studies of hyperfine interactions using Mössbauer effect techniques [25]. An underlying goal of this research took into consideration the results of the previous reports which suggested that the formation of crystallites occurs more easily at the surface than in the bulk [26][27][28][29]. Differences in bulk and surface crystallization have already been pointed out in metal-metalloid glasses [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As for the sources of the stress, the so-called macroscopic heterogeneity (MH) [1] is considered in this work. MH is the term [2] we propose to encompass certain effects connected to: "native oxide layer" [3], "different SRO at the surfaces" [4] and "surface crystallization" [5]. The quoted terms have something common -all point to a largescale heterogeneity across the ribbon thickness, ie to various differences between the surfaces (surface-adjacent layers) and the deeper layers (interior).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it results in very low Curie temperatures (T C ∼ room temperature) both in the quenched state and in relaxed and partly crystallized states of the alloy, which promises interesting applications in the future. The magnetic properties of the system were reported in [8][9][10][11], influence of the Fe/B ratio on the thermodynamic properties was studied in [12] and the kinetic characterization of nanocrystal formation in Fe 76 Mo 8 Cu 1 B 15 was done in [13]. It was found [13] that the devitrification of FeMoCuB is a multistage process that does not follow the simple Johnson-Mehl-Avrami kinetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%