2016
DOI: 10.1002/pc.24144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic nanoparticle containing thiol‐ene crosslinked hydrogels for controlled and targeted release of hydrophobic drugs

Abstract: This study reports a straightforward but very effective method to produce nanocomposite hydrogels for targeted drug delivery system. An organic network containing both hydrophilic and hydrophobic components was obtained using thiol‐ene cross‐linking. Magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs) were synthesized by chemical co‐precipitation. The surface of the MNPs was modified with allyl groups to avoid agglomeration. Composite hydrogels were prepared by addition of surface modified MNPs to hydrogel formulation at different… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of physically blending MMPs into the hydrogel which might induce leakage and cell cytotoxicity, MMPs were instead grafted onto GelGMA and HAGMA backbone by a thiol–ene click reaction as confirmed by the appearance of a carbon–sulfur chemical bond (Figure S2c). As shown in Figure c, a permanent magnet can induce reversible deformation of the GHAM hydrogel. Large-size MMPs with an average diameter of ∼3.5 μm were used here (Figure S6) to improve the hydrogel stiffening/softening effect and minimize nanomaterial-associated cytotoxicity due to unintended endocytosis. , The magneto-responsiveness and superparamagnetic property of GHAM hydrogel were also confirmed by superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) analysis (Figure d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Instead of physically blending MMPs into the hydrogel which might induce leakage and cell cytotoxicity, MMPs were instead grafted onto GelGMA and HAGMA backbone by a thiol–ene click reaction as confirmed by the appearance of a carbon–sulfur chemical bond (Figure S2c). As shown in Figure c, a permanent magnet can induce reversible deformation of the GHAM hydrogel. Large-size MMPs with an average diameter of ∼3.5 μm were used here (Figure S6) to improve the hydrogel stiffening/softening effect and minimize nanomaterial-associated cytotoxicity due to unintended endocytosis. , The magneto-responsiveness and superparamagnetic property of GHAM hydrogel were also confirmed by superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) analysis (Figure d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Instead of physically blending TMPs into the hydrogel, which might lead to leakage and cytotoxicity, TMPs were grafted onto the PEGDA backbone by a thiol‐ene click reaction, to minimize TMP leakage (<0.5%, Figure 2c). [ 29 ] This observation is further corroborated by the detection of a C‐S chemical bond through FTIR analysis, though the peak stretching appears relatively weak, likely due to the low concentration of TMP and a minimal presence of thiol groups (Figure S2e, Supporting Information). In comparison, a heightened degree of leakage was noted in the group wherein physical encapsulation in the hydrogel occurred (i.e., pure magnetic particles without thiol groups), indicating the significance of thiol‐ene chemical binding (Figure S2f, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, the slower drug release probably due to the fact that the nanoparticles has larger diameters and thicker shells, allowing the drug to be embedded deeper into the nanoparticles. [ 48,49 ] These phenomena jointly indicated that pH‐responsive CS‐95%/SBE 7 ‐β‐CD nanoparticles have great superiority in drug loading and controlled drug release. Therefore, SF‐loaded nanoparticles are expected to be candidates for efficient drug delivery in vivo, especially from the stomach to the intestine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%