2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4526(99)01938-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic off-specular neutron scattering from Fe/Cr multilayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a good interpretation of the measured data it is therefore important to measure both specular and off-specular signals. 13,32,33 …”
Section: A Spatial Coherence Of the Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a good interpretation of the measured data it is therefore important to measure both specular and off-specular signals. 13,32,33 …”
Section: A Spatial Coherence Of the Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 At grazing incidence, the lengths obtained by projecting the coherence volume of the neutron beam on the sample surface may become rather large ͑up to the mm range͒ but usually remain smaller than the sample surface and therefore have to be compared with the lengths of lateral correlations present in the sample. This can have important consequences for the interpretation and simulation of specular reflectivity 20 and off-specular scattering, 13,32,33 as explained in Sec. II A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10]) by a theoretical model. However, in this case a possible contamination of the specular intensity by diffuse scattering, which is often seen from exchange coupled ML [11,12], should be accounted for. Then a complete evaluation [11] of the data is required, while valuable information such as the mean angle between sublattice magnetization and external field [13,14] can be obtained analyzing some particular features of offspecular scattering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain-size-dependent resistance noise, for example, may be as large as to limit GMR-sensor applications [21]. Therefore, indirect methods like resistance noise [21] and magnetoresistance [24] measurements, off-specular non-polarised [25] and polarised neutron reflectometry [26,27] and, recently, soft-X-ray resonant magnetic diffuse scattering [28] have been used to estimate the AF-domain-size distribution in magnetic MLs. In fact, Kerr-microscopy has been performed so far only on thick trilayers [22,23].…”
Section: Direction Of the Layer Magnetisation In Coupled Multilayersmentioning
confidence: 99%