We have studied the effect of heat treatment on the magnetic properties and on the martensitic transition of the Ni 50 Mn 30 Al 20 alloy. A mixed L2 1 ϩB2 state is obtained in the as-prepared sample, while no L2 1 order is retained in the sample quenched from high temperature. For the two heat treatments, the samples order antiferromagnetically, but there is evidence of coexisting ferromagnetic interactions. A martensitic transition occurs below the magnetic one for quenched samples. However, the martensitic transition is inhibited in the as-prepared sample. © 2003 American Institute of Physics. ͓DOI: 10.1063/1.1555977͔ Magnetic alloys undergoing structural transitions have received much attention due to the peculiar properties arising from the coupling between structure and magnetism. Among them, magnetic field induced strains 1 and magnetocaloric effect 2 are of particular interest due to their potential application as sensors and actuators and as magnetic refrigerators. This article reports results on Ni-Mn-Al alloys, which are potential candidates to exhibit giant magnetic field induced strains. 3 These magnetic induced strains occur in ferromagnetic systems undergoing a martensitic transformation. They originate from the reorientation of martensite domains promoted by the difference in the Zeeman energy. 4 Currently, the only alloy which has shown giant ͑up to 10%͒ deformations 5 is the Ni-Mn-Ga alloy, for compositions close to the stoichiometric Ni 2 MnGa. However, the brittelness of this alloy has prompted the research of alternative materials.It was established 6,7 that for Ni-Mn-Ga, the phase stability is controlled by the average number of valence electrons per atom. In Fig. 1 we compare the phase diagram of Ni-Mn-Al to that of Ni-Mn-Ga. It is assumed that the number of valence electrons per atom for Ni, Mn, Ga, and Al atoms are 10 (3d 8 4d 2 ), 7 (3d 5 4s 2 ), 3 (4s 2 4p 1 ), and 3 (3s 2 3p 1 ), respectively. The phase diagram of Ni-Mn-Al agrees with the restricted data previously published. 8 From the figure it is clear that for this alloy, the stability of the different phases is controlled by the valence electron concentration as occurs with Ni-Mn-Ga. The phase diagrams of the two alloy systems exhibit a number of general trends. At high temperatures the alloys exhibit a nearest-neighbors ordered structure, B2 ͑Pm3m͒, and upon cooling, next-nearest neighbors order, L2 1 (Fm3m) is expected to develop. For Ni-Mn-Al, the transition line for this order-disorder transition is located at temperatures significantly lower than for Ni-Mn-Ga. This results in a very slow kinetics for the ordering process, and recent studies on a stoichiometric compound 9 have shown that long time annealings just below the order-disorder line do not stabilize a single L2 1 phase, but rather a mixed L2 1 ϩB2 state. This is in contrast to NiMn-Ga alloys for which the B2-L2 1 transition occurs very fast. 10 At temperatures close to room temperature, magnetic ordering occurs. The L2 1 phase is ferromagnetic and for NiMn-Al, the ma...