2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Properties of a Dinuclear Nickel(II) Complex with 2,6-Bis[(2-hydroxyethyl)methylaminomethyl]-4-methylphenolate

Abstract: Magnetic properties of dinuclear nickel(II) complex [Ni(sym-hmp)](BPh)·3.5DMF·0.5(2-PrOH) (1), where (sym-hmp) is 2,6-bis[(2-hydroxyethyl)methylaminomethyl]-4-methylphenolate anion and DMF indicates dimethylformamide, were investigated using high-frequency and -field electron paramagnetic resonance (HFEPR). To magnetically characterize the mononuclear nickel(II) species forming the dimer, its two dinuclear zinc(II) analogues, [Zn(sym-hmp)](BPh)·3.5DMF·0.5(2-PrOH) (2) and [Zn(sym-hmp)](BPh)·2acetone·2HO (2'), w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The crossover angle between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interaction is 97°, which closely resembles those of dinuclear Cu( ii ) systems (97.5°) due to the dominant role of the d x 2 − y 2 magnetic orbital over d z 2 in dictating magnetic interaction. 34–37 1 follows this criterion with a weak antiferromagnetic interaction indicated by the 97.2° bridge angle. Broken symmetry DFT calculations using the ORCA 5.0.3 software package correctly predict the antiferromagnetic coupling constant qualitatively but overestimate the J value (see the ESI†) due to systematic over-localization of electrons in the DFT approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The crossover angle between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interaction is 97°, which closely resembles those of dinuclear Cu( ii ) systems (97.5°) due to the dominant role of the d x 2 − y 2 magnetic orbital over d z 2 in dictating magnetic interaction. 34–37 1 follows this criterion with a weak antiferromagnetic interaction indicated by the 97.2° bridge angle. Broken symmetry DFT calculations using the ORCA 5.0.3 software package correctly predict the antiferromagnetic coupling constant qualitatively but overestimate the J value (see the ESI†) due to systematic over-localization of electrons in the DFT approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The small but negative J value indicated a weak antiferromagnetic interaction. Although it is considered difficult to determine the zero-field splitting from the magnetic data, the D parameter can often be obtained, 24 because the parameters differ in the temperature range involved and the degree of decrease.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polidentat ligantlar arasındaki Schiff bazları, kataliz, ışık veren problar, analitik kimya, manyeto-yapısal kimya, tarımsal ilaç kimya, biyolojik alanlar gibi çeşitli alanlarda potansiyel uygulamaları nedeniyle özellikle ilgi çekicidir [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Çok sayıda binükleer kompleks yapı sentezlenmiş ve bu yapılar içinde çeşitli köprülerin aracılık ettiği Ni (II) iyonları arasındaki değişimden kaynaklanan etkileşimlerin niteliğini ve gücünü yöneten faktörlerin araştırılması için model olarak literatürlerde belirtilmiştir; fenoksido [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], azido [19,20], cyanato ve tiocyanato [19,21], karboksilat [22] vb. Schiff bazlı komplekslerin, yapılarında mevcut olan hetero ve metal atomları nedeniyle önemli biyoaktivite [23] gösterdiği bildirilmiştir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified