Iron in Soils and Clay Minerals 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-4007-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magnetic Properties of Iron in Soil Iron Oxides and Clay Minerals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0
9

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
47
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the 6C1 fit is improved with the two-site model; the 5C1-4 and 3C1 spectra, not shown, are very similar. However, the model fails to fit the background for 2C1, suggesting a contribution from a weak magnetic component with transition temperature near 300 K. The results of the fits to the 300 K spectra of the seven "surface" samples are presented in Table 4, along with reported parameter values for fertihydrite (formula varies, e.g.,-FesHO8.4H20 [Murad, 1988] or 5Fe203.9H20 [Coey, 1988] The situation regarding the 2C1 and 3C1 samples is less clear. While the 300 K data are consistent with ferrihydrite, no associated magnetic transition is observed down to 13 K. The fit results (Table 6), including the low-temperature data, demonstrate that the weak magnetic component seen at 300 K in the 2C1 spectrum is due to goethite, which is often found associated with ferrihydrite in watery environments [Schwertmann, 1988].…”
Section: Primary Precipitates ("Surface" Samples)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that the 6C1 fit is improved with the two-site model; the 5C1-4 and 3C1 spectra, not shown, are very similar. However, the model fails to fit the background for 2C1, suggesting a contribution from a weak magnetic component with transition temperature near 300 K. The results of the fits to the 300 K spectra of the seven "surface" samples are presented in Table 4, along with reported parameter values for fertihydrite (formula varies, e.g.,-FesHO8.4H20 [Murad, 1988] or 5Fe203.9H20 [Coey, 1988] The situation regarding the 2C1 and 3C1 samples is less clear. While the 300 K data are consistent with ferrihydrite, no associated magnetic transition is observed down to 13 K. The fit results (Table 6), including the low-temperature data, demonstrate that the weak magnetic component seen at 300 K in the 2C1 spectrum is due to goethite, which is often found associated with ferrihydrite in watery environments [Schwertmann, 1988].…”
Section: Primary Precipitates ("Surface" Samples)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Goethite (αFeOOH) is widely distributed in soils, rocks, sediments, and ores [1,2], and it can be a source material for catalysts [3], magnetic materials [4], and in iron production [5]. In the past few decades, the thermal decomposition of goethite into hematite has been reported from various viewpoints, including kinetics analysis [6], spectroscopy [7,8], diffractometry [9,10], and electron microscopy [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lepidocrocite structure, ferric iron is coordinated in edge-shared octahedra, which form layers within [001] linked by hydrogen bridges [Ewing, 1935]. Information on magnetic properties has been largely obtained from Mössbauer spectroscopy [Coey, 1988]. Mössbauer studies show magnetic ordering between 73 and 77 K for well-crystalline lepidocrocite and complete ordering by 4.2 K [Johnson, 1969;Murad and Schwertman, 1984].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%